Navigating Parenthood: An Analysis of Family Planning Decisions in the United States

1. Introduction

The decision to have children, how many to have, and when to have them represents one of the most significant and personal choices individuals and couples make in their lifetimes. In the United States, these decisions are shaped by a complex interplay of individual circumstances, societal trends, economic realities, and evolving cultural norms.¹ Family planning is not merely a matter of personal preference but is deeply embedded within broader social, economic, and health contexts, influencing not only individual lives but also demographic trajectories and societal structures.²

This report aims to provide an expert-level analysis of the multifaceted factors influencing family planning decisions in the U.S. It will explore current demographic trends, delve into the various considerations that inform choices about whether, when, and how many children to have, and examine the disparities that persist in family planning access and outcomes. Furthermore, the report will investigate the decision-making processes individuals and couples undertake, the support systems available to them, and the broader implications of these collective choices. By synthesizing research from diverse sources, this analysis seeks to offer a comprehensive understanding of the contemporary landscape of family planning in the United States.

The subsequent sections will systematically address:

• Current demographic trends, including fertility rates, age at first birth, and childlessness.
• Factors influencing the decision whether to have children, encompassing personal, societal, and economic dimensions.
• Considerations affecting decisions on how many children to have, such as resource availability and desired family dynamics.
• Factors influencing the timing of parenthood, including career aspirations and perceptions of optimal parental age.
• Persistent disparities in family planning access and outcomes across different demographic groups.
• The decision-making processes and support systems, including informational resources and counseling services.
• The broader societal and economic implications of current family planning trends and future directions for research and policy.

Understanding these intricate dynamics is crucial for policymakers, healthcare providers, researchers, and individuals alike as they navigate the evolving landscape of family formation in the 21st century.

2. Current Demographic Trends in the US: An Overview

The landscape of family formation in the United States has undergone significant transformations in recent decades, characterized by notable shifts in fertility rates, the timing of parenthood, and the prevalence of childlessness. These demographic trends provide a crucial backdrop for understanding contemporary family planning decisions.

2.1. Fertility Rates: Declines and Implications

The U.S. has experienced a sustained decline in fertility rates. The total fertility rate (TFR), which represents the average number of children a woman would have in her lifetime if current age-specific fertility rates remained constant, fell from approximately the replacement level of 2.1 births per woman in 1990 to 1.62 births per woman in 2023.⁴ This is significantly below the replacement level needed for a population to replace itself from one generation to the next without immigration.⁴ The general fertility rate (GFR), or annual births per 1,000 women aged 15-44, also saw a substantial decrease, from 70.9 in 1990 to 56.0 in 2020, and further to 54.5 in 2023.³ This downward trajectory was observed across most states, with 43 states recording their lowest GFR in at least three decades in 2020.³ Economic downturns, such as the Great Recession, have historically led to temporary postponements in childbearing, but the subsequent recovery did not see a rebound in birth rates; instead, the decline has largely continued.³

The decline in overall fertility is primarily driven by a steep reduction in birth rates among women younger than 30.⁴ If the 1990 birth rates for women under 30 had remained constant, the 2023 TFR would have been notably higher, at adjusted rates between 1.77 and 1.91, compared to the actual 1.62.⁴ This indicates a fundamental shift in childbearing patterns among younger cohorts. These falling fertility rates have significant implications, potentially leading to smaller working-age populations in the future, which could strain tax bases and social security systems, and impact economic growth.³

2.2. Age at First Birth: A Consistent Upward Trend

A key feature of current demographic trends is the increasing age at which women are having their first child. Birth rates for women aged 30 and older have increased, while rates for those under 30 have decreased.⁴ Specifically, between 1990 and 2023:

• Births to females younger than 20 declined by 73%.
• Births to women aged 20-24 declined by 44%.
• Births to women aged 25-29 declined by 23%. Conversely:
• The birth rate for women aged 30-34 increased by 17%, becoming the age group with the highest age-specific birth rate in 2023.
• The birth rate for women aged 35-39 increased by 71%.
• The birth rate for women aged 40-44 increased by 127%, and for those 45 and older by 450%.⁴

This shift has resulted in a significant change in maternal age distribution. In 1990, women younger than 30 accounted for nearly 70% of births; by 2023, they accounted for less than half (48.6%). Conversely, women aged 30 and older accounted for just over half of all births in 2023 (51.4%), up from about 30% in 1990.⁴ Pew Research Center data from March 2025 indicates that, on average, Americans believe the best age to have a first child is 27.3 years, which aligns closely with the actual median age of first birth for U.S. women (27.4 years).⁹ This delay in parenthood is linked to various factors, including pursuit of higher education, career establishment, and changing societal norms around marriage and family formation.¹

2.3. Rising Childlessness: Voluntary and Involuntary

Concurrent with declining fertility and delayed parenthood is an increase in the proportion of adults who do not have children and do not expect to ever have them. A 2021 Pew Research Center survey found that 44% of non-parents aged 18-49 reported it was “not too or not at all likely” they would have children someday, a 7-percentage point increase from 37% in 2018.¹¹ This trend is particularly pronounced among younger adults. A more recent Pew survey from July 2025 confirmed this, noting the share of U.S. adults younger than 50 without children who say they are unlikely to ever have kids rose 10 percentage points between 2018 and 2023 (from 37% to 47%).¹²

The reasons for remaining childfree are varied. Among non-parents younger than 50 who say it’s unlikely they will have children, a majority (56% in 2021, 57% in the younger group in the 2025 survey) state they simply do not want to have kids.¹¹ Other cited reasons include medical issues, financial constraints, not having a partner, concerns about the state of the world, and environmental reasons.¹¹ The Aspen Institute also highlights that rising childlessness is a primary driver of declining birth rates, with the share of women aged 35-44 reporting zero children ever born increasing from 16.1% in 2012 to 20% in 2022.⁸ This phenomenon encompasses both voluntary childlessness (choosing not to have children) and involuntary childlessness (wanting children but being unable to have them due to factors like infertility or circumstance).¹³ The increasing prevalence of childlessness, whether by choice or circumstance, contributes significantly to the overall decline in U.S. birth rates and has long-term societal and economic implications.⁸

These demographic shifts—lower fertility, older maternal ages, and rising childlessness—reflect profound changes in individual priorities, societal expectations, and economic conditions, all of which intricately influence family planning decisions in the U.S.

3. Factors Influencing the Decision Whether to Have Children

The decision of whether or not to have children is a deeply personal one, yet it is profoundly influenced by a confluence of individual aspirations, societal messages, and economic realities. These factors often interact, creating a complex calculus for prospective parents.

3.1. Personal Considerations

Individual life goals, values, health, and relationship dynamics play a central role in the decision to pursue parenthood.

• Career Aspirations and Educational Goals: Many individuals prioritize establishing their careers and achieving educational milestones before considering children.¹ The desire for professional advancement and the time and financial investment required for education can lead to delaying or forgoing parenthood.¹ Research indicates that delaying motherhood can lead to substantial increases in earnings and wages for women, particularly for those who are college-educated or in professional and managerial occupations.¹⁰ This economic incentive, coupled with the desire for personal and professional growth, makes career and education significant factors in family planning.
• Lifestyle Preferences and Personal Values: The desire for personal freedom, autonomy, and self-development are key reasons some individuals choose to be childfree.¹⁴ The “DINK” (Dual Income, No Kids) lifestyle, which prioritizes discretionary income, free time, travel, and career opportunities, is gaining traction, reflecting a shift where personal freedom is highly valued.¹⁵ For these individuals, children may be viewed as limiting these freedoms.¹⁵ Personal values regarding the meaning of life, fulfillment, and the role of family also heavily influence this decision.¹³ Some individuals may not feel a strong desire for parenthood or may find fulfillment through other avenues.¹¹
• Health and Well-being (Physical and Mental): Physical and mental health are crucial considerations.¹ Prospective parents may consider their own health status, the potential risks of pregnancy, and the physical and emotional demands of raising children.¹⁸ For women with chronic illnesses, family planning involves careful consultation with healthcare providers to manage their condition, assess medication safety during pregnancy, and consider potential impacts on both their health and the baby’s.¹⁹ Mental health is also a significant factor; pre-existing mental health conditions can influence reproductive health and postpartum adjustment, making it essential to address these issues before conceiving.¹⁸ Concerns about the psychological toll of parenthood, including stress and potential regret, also feature in decision-making.¹⁸
• Relationship Dynamics: The stability and quality of a couple’s relationship are important.¹ Differing opinions between partners regarding parenthood can arise from varying social, economic, and cultural perceptions.¹ A strong, supportive partnership is often seen as a prerequisite for raising children, while relationship instability may lead individuals to delay or avoid parenthood.²³ For single individuals considering parenthood, the availability of a strong support network is a key factor.²⁴

3.2. Societal and Cultural Influences

Societal norms, cultural expectations, and broader social trends significantly shape the context within which individuals make family planning decisions.

• Cultural Norms and Community Expectations: Traditional cultural norms in many communities exert pressure to have children, often early and in larger numbers.¹ These expectations can influence decisions about contraception and desired family size.¹ Societal values around gender roles and familial duty can particularly impact women’s autonomy in reproductive choices.¹ However, these norms are evolving.
• Shifting Views on Marriage and Family: Recent decades have seen a shift in cultural norms, with increasing delays in marriage and childbearing.²⁶ Cohabitation, premarital parenting, and voluntary childlessness are becoming more commonplace, reflecting a cultural move towards individualism and self-expression.²⁶ Marriage is transitioning for some from a foundational step to an aspirational one.²⁶ These shifts provide greater flexibility in family planning decisions.
• Gender Role Evolution: Changes in gender roles, particularly women’s increased participation in the workforce and pursuit of higher education, have significantly impacted family planning.²⁶ As women invest more in their careers, decisions about childbearing are often integrated with professional aspirations, sometimes leading to delays or decisions to have fewer or no children.¹ More egalitarian relationships may also lead to more shared decision-making regarding family size and timing.²⁷
• Influence of Religion and Secularization: Religious beliefs can play a significant role, with many religions holding procreation and family as central tenets.¹ Religious doctrines often guide followers on matters of family planning and contraception, though adherence varies.²⁵ Concurrently, secularization trends and the emphasis on individual autonomy are also influencing decisions, sometimes leading to choices that diverge from traditional religious teachings.²⁸ The interplay between faith and secular values creates a complex environment for reproductive choices.
• Environmental and Global Concerns: A growing number of individuals, particularly younger generations, cite concerns about the state of the world, including climate change and overpopulation, as factors influencing their decision not to have children.¹¹ These anxieties stem from worries about the future their children would inherit and the environmental impact of increasing the population.³⁰
• Pronatalism and Social Pressure: Despite evolving norms, a societal pressure known as “pronatalism”—the belief that parenthood should be a central focus of adult life—persists.¹³ This can lead to individuals who choose to be childfree feeling marginalized or judged, making the decision more challenging.¹³

3.3. Economic and Financial Factors

Economic stability and financial considerations are paramount in the decision to have children.

• Cost of Raising a Child: The financial impact of having a child is substantial, encompassing healthcare, education, childcare, and daily living expenses.¹ The USDA estimated over a decade ago that raising a child to age 17 cost a middle-income family over $230,000, a figure that varies by location and income.⁵ Current concerns about the high cost of basics like food and housing further amplify these financial pressures.²¹
• Economic Stability and Opportunity: Economic stability is often linked to access to contraceptives and family planning services, making financial status a critical factor.¹ Financial instability or economic downturns can cause individuals and couples to postpone or reconsider having children.¹ The perceived lack of economic opportunity or job security can also deter prospective parents.²³
• Access to Resources and Support: The availability and affordability of childcare are major economic considerations.⁵ High childcare costs and shortages of available options (“childcare deserts”) present significant barriers for many families.⁵ Furthermore, the adequacy of parental leave policies and other forms of support for parents influences decisions.²¹
• Impact on Career and Earnings: As mentioned, women, in particular, may consider the potential impact of childbearing on their career trajectory and lifetime earnings.¹ The “mommy track” phenomenon, where mothers may face wage penalties or slower career progression, is a tangible economic concern.¹⁰

The decision of whether to have children is thus a deeply personal journey navigated within a broad and often challenging landscape of individual desires, societal expectations, and economic realities. The increasing trend towards delaying or forgoing parenthood in the U.S. reflects a complex weighing of these diverse and interconnected factors.

4. Factors Influencing How Many Children to Have

Once the decision to have children is made, the question of how many arises. This choice is also influenced by a variety of interconnected factors, ranging from practical resource considerations to deeply personal desires about family life.

4.1. Resource Considerations (Financial, Time, Space)

The availability of resources is a primary determinant of desired family size.

• Financial Capacity: The significant cost of raising each child, including expenses for housing, food, healthcare, education, and childcare, heavily influences how many children individuals or couples feel they can adequately support.¹ As family size increases, these costs multiply, though some economies of scale may exist.³³ Concerns about being able to afford more children are a major limiting factor for many.²¹
• Time Availability and Parental Capacity: Raising children is time-intensive, requiring significant emotional and physical energy.¹⁷ Parents must consider their capacity to dedicate sufficient time to each child for nurturing, guidance, and involvement in their lives, especially when balancing work and family responsibilities.¹⁷ The desire to provide quality time and attention to each child can lead to preferences for smaller families.
• Living Space and Environment: Available living space is a practical consideration.¹⁷ Larger families typically require more physical space, which can be a constraint, particularly in urban areas or regions with high housing costs. The suitability of the living environment, including access to good schools and safe neighborhoods, also plays a role. Some research suggests that urban populations may have smaller household sizes due to smaller dwellings and the higher cost per child in urban settings.³³

4.2. Desired Family Dynamics and Experiences

Beyond practical resources, individuals’ visions for their family life and the experiences they wish to cultivate for themselves and their children are crucial.

• Companionship and Sibling Relationships: The desire for children to have siblings for companionship is a common factor influencing decisions to have more than one child.¹⁷ Parents may envision a lively household with multiple children interacting and supporting one another.
• Parental Experience and Fulfillment: Some individuals derive great joy and fulfillment from the experience of parenting and may desire a larger family to extend this experience.²⁴ The perceived challenges and rewards of raising multiple children contribute to this aspect of decision-making.
• Quality of Relationships within the Family Unit: Consideration of existing family dynamics and the potential impact of additional children on these relationships is important.¹⁷ Parents may aim for a family size that they believe will foster positive and supportive interactions among all members.
• Cultural and Personal Ideals of Family Size: Cultural norms and societal expectations can shape perceptions of an ideal family size.¹ While these norms are evolving, the two-child family remains a common preference in the U.S..²¹ However, personal preferences, shaped by individual values and aspirations, ultimately drive the decision.¹⁷ Some individuals may desire larger families reflecting their upbringing or personal ideals, while others prefer smaller families or only children, despite some societal biases against the latter.²¹

4.3. Personal Capacity and Well-being

The ability of parents to manage the demands of a certain family size while maintaining their own well-being is a critical, though sometimes overlooked, factor.

• Emotional and Physical Reserves: Parents must assess their emotional and physical capacity to handle the stresses and joys of raising a particular number of children.¹⁷ Factors like parental age, health, and energy levels can influence this assessment.
• Mental Health: Concerns about mental health and the potential for parental burnout can impact decisions about family size.²¹ The desire to maintain a healthy work-life balance and avoid being overwhelmed by parenting responsibilities may lead to smaller family size preferences.²¹
• Support Systems: The availability of support from partners, extended family, friends, and community resources can influence a couple’s confidence in managing a larger family. Lack of adequate support can be a significant barrier to having more children.²¹

A recent survey by Population Connection found that while a two-child family was the most desired size, a significant portion of adults felt limited by the state of the world and affordability in achieving their desired family size.²¹ This highlights the gap that can exist between ideal family size and the practical realities individuals face, underscoring the complex interplay of desires, resources, and personal capacity in determining how many children to have.

5. Factors Influencing When to Have Children (Timing of Parenthood)

The decision of when to start a family is as critical as whether to have children and how many. It involves a complex balancing act of personal development, career ambitions, relationship readiness, and biological considerations. The consistent upward trend in the age at first birth in the U.S. underscores the evolving nature of these calculations.⁴

5.1. Perceived Optimal Parental Age and Life Stage

Societal and personal perceptions of an “ideal” age or life stage for parenthood play a role, though these are increasingly flexible.

• Societal Norms and Milestones: While traditional timelines for marriage and parenthood are becoming less rigid, there are still societal notions about appropriate ages for these life events.⁹ A March 2025 Pew Research Center survey found that among U.S. adults who believe there is a best age to have a first child, the largest share (28%) said it’s between 25 and 29, with an average ideal age of 27.3.⁹ This aligns closely with the actual median age of first birth.⁹
• Personal Readiness: Beyond societal views, individuals assess their own emotional maturity, financial stability, and overall preparedness for the responsibilities of parenthood.¹ Many delay childbearing until they feel they have achieved a certain level of personal growth and stability.¹

5.2. Career Progression and Educational Goals

The pursuit of education and career establishment is a primary driver for delaying parenthood, particularly for women.

• Establishing Financial Stability and Professional Milestones: Individuals often wish to achieve financial stability and specific career milestones before having children.¹ This is seen as providing a better foundation for raising a family.
• Human Capital Accumulation: Delaying motherhood allows women to accumulate more human capital (education and work experience), which can lead to higher earnings and wages.¹⁰ Research shows a significant earnings increase (around 9% per year of delay) for women who postpone childbearing, especially for college-educated women and those in professional fields.¹⁰ This economic advantage is a powerful incentive for timing parenthood after career foundations are laid.
• Balancing Career and Childcare: Skilled women, particularly in occupations demanding long hours or where early human capital accumulation is critical, are more likely to delay fertility.¹⁰ The challenge of balancing demanding careers with childcare responsibilities is a major consideration in timing decisions.¹⁰

5.3. Relationship Maturity and Stability

The status and perceived maturity of a couple’s relationship are key factors in deciding when to have children.

• Relationship Stability: Many individuals prefer to have children within a stable, committed relationship.²³ Delays in marriage or finding a suitable partner can consequently lead to delays in childbearing.¹
• Shared Goals and Preparedness: Couples often wait until they feel their relationship is mature enough and both partners are aligned in their desire and readiness for parenthood.²² This includes discussions about parenting philosophies, financial preparedness, and the division of labor.

5.4. Awareness of Age-Related Fertility Decline and Health Risks

While social and economic factors often push towards later parenthood, biological realities also influence timing decisions, though sometimes with incomplete understanding.

• Fertility Decline with Age: Female fertility naturally declines with age, particularly after 30 and more significantly after 35.³⁶ Male fertility also declines with age, though less sharply.³⁷ This biological clock can create pressure to not delay parenthood too long.
• Increased Health Risks: Delayed childbearing is associated with increased risks of infertility, pregnancy complications (such as gestational diabetes, hypertension, caesarian sections), and adverse neonatal outcomes (like preterm birth and low birth weight) for the mother, and chromosomal abnormalities for the child.¹⁰
• Fertility Knowledge Gaps: Despite the known age-related decline in fertility, some individuals may overestimate their fertility potential at older ages or lack sufficient awareness of their reproductive capacity, leading them to postpone childbearing further than might be optimal if they desire biological children.³⁶

5.5. Implications of Delayed Parenthood

The trend of delaying parenthood has wide-ranging implications for individuals, families, and society.

• For Individuals and Couples:

• Economic Benefits: As discussed, later motherhood can lead to higher lifetime earnings for women.¹⁰ Families may benefit from greater financial stability when children are born to older, more established parents.³⁸
• Reduced Family Size: Delaying the first birth often results in smaller completed family sizes, as the window for childbearing narrows.³⁶ It can also lead to involuntary childlessness if fertility issues arise.³⁶
• Medical Risks: Increased maternal and infant health risks are associated with advanced parental age.¹⁰
• For Children:

• Improved Economic Outcomes: Children born to older parents who delayed childbearing and increased their educational attainment may experience better economic outcomes, including higher family income in their own adulthood.³⁸
• Potential for Smaller Sibling Groups: Delayed parenthood contributes to smaller family sizes, meaning children may grow up with fewer or no siblings.
• Older Grandparents: Children of older parents will likely have older grandparents, potentially impacting intergenerational relationships and support.³⁶
• For Society:

• Demographic Shifts: Widespread delayed parenthood contributes to lower overall fertility rates and an aging population structure.⁴
• Increased Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART): As more couples delay childbearing, the demand for ART may increase, with associated economic and ethical considerations.³⁶

The decision of when to have children is thus a multifaceted one, reflecting a dynamic interplay between aspirations for personal and professional fulfillment, relationship readiness, and awareness of biological and health factors. The prevailing trend towards later parenthood in the U.S. highlights a significant societal shift with lasting consequences.

6. Disparities in Family Planning: Access, Outcomes, and Autonomy

Despite advancements in reproductive health, significant disparities in family planning access, outcomes, and decision-making autonomy persist across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic lines in the United States. These inequities have profound implications for individual well-being and contribute to broader cycles of disadvantage.⁴⁰

6.1. Racial and Ethnic Disparities

Prominent racial and ethnic disparities are evident in several key family planning indicators:

• Unintended Pregnancy: Rates of unintended pregnancy (both mistimed and undesired) are consistently higher among minority women. Black women experience the highest rates, followed by Hispanic women, compared to White women.⁴⁰ These disparities persist even within similar income groups, suggesting that factors beyond economic status are at play.⁴⁰ Unintended pregnancies can lead to adverse health outcomes for both mother and child, including inadequate prenatal care and developmental delays.²
• Abortion Rates: Abortion rates also show striking differences. In 2000, Black women had significantly higher abortion rates per 1,000 women compared to Hispanic and White women.⁴⁰ The proportion of women having abortions who were low-SES or minority women increased markedly between 1994 and 2000.⁴⁰
• Contraceptive Use Patterns: Minority women are often less likely to use contraception overall, may use different and sometimes less effective methods, and experience higher rates of contraceptive failure compared to White women.⁴⁰ For instance, Black and Hispanic women are more likely to rely on female sterilization and use methods like Depo-Provera and condoms, while White women are more likely to use oral contraceptives.⁴⁰
• Adolescent Pregnancy: While teen pregnancy rates have declined overall, significant racial and ethnic disparities remain, with higher rates among Black and Hispanic adolescents compared to White adolescents.²

6.2. Socioeconomic Disparities

Socioeconomic status (SES), often measured by income and education level, is a strong predictor of family planning outcomes:

• Unintended Pregnancy and SES: Women with lower incomes (e.g., below the Federal Poverty Level) and lower educational attainment have significantly higher rates of unintended pregnancy.⁴⁰ This correlation holds true within each racial/ethnic group, indicating the independent impact of SES.⁴⁰
• Contraceptive Access and Affordability: Low-SES women are more likely to be uninsured or underinsured, creating financial barriers to accessing contraception, particularly prescription methods.¹ The Hyde Amendment, restricting federal Medicaid funding for most abortions, disproportionately affects low-income women, potentially leading to delays in care or unintended births.⁴⁰
• Access to Family Planning Services: Federally funded family planning programs, such as those under Title X, primarily serve lower-income women.⁴¹ While these programs have been shown to reduce childbearing among poor women, funding fluctuations and policy changes can impact service availability.³⁸

6.3. Underlying Factors Contributing to Disparities

The observed disparities are rooted in a complex interplay of historical, cultural, systemic, and individual factors:

• Cultural and Historical Context: A history of discriminatory practices in reproductive healthcare, including nonconsensual sterilization targeting poor and minority women, has fostered distrust between these communities and family planning providers.⁴⁰ This historical context adds complexity to current disparities.⁴⁰
• Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs: Differences in knowledge about contraception and reproductive health, as well as varying attitudes towards pregnancy and contraception, contribute to disparities.²⁵ Misinformation, safety concerns about contraceptives (sometimes fueled by historical mistreatment), and cultural myths can influence contraceptive choices and uptake.⁴⁰
• Healthcare System Factors: Barriers within the healthcare system, such as lack of insurance, cost of services, inconvenient clinic hours or locations, and lack of culturally competent care, disproportionately affect minority and low-SES women.¹ The way contraceptive information is provided, often at high reading levels or through a purely medical model, may not be optimal for all populations.⁴⁰
• Provider-Related Factors: Provider bias, conscious or unconscious, can influence the quality of counseling and the range of methods offered to patients from different backgrounds.⁴⁰ Ensuring patient-centered care, where providers respect patient preferences and values, is crucial.⁴⁰
• Social and Economic Context: Decisions about childbearing occur within a context of vast inequities in resources available for child-rearing.⁴⁰ The family planning experiences of disadvantaged women are inevitably shaped by these broader social and economic inequalities.⁴⁰ Issues like housing instability, food insecurity, and lack of educational and employment opportunities can indirectly impact family planning choices and outcomes.
• Ambivalence Towards Pregnancy: Higher levels of ambivalence toward pregnancy have been reported among Black and Hispanic women compared to White women, which is associated with decreased use of effective contraception and an increased likelihood of unintended pregnancy.⁴⁰

Addressing these deep-seated disparities requires a multifaceted approach that tackles systemic barriers, promotes health equity, ensures access to comprehensive and culturally sensitive reproductive healthcare services, and empowers all individuals to make informed decisions about their reproductive lives.¹ The ability to plan pregnancies as desired is not only a matter of individual health but also a crucial factor in mitigating cycles of disadvantage for vulnerable populations.⁴⁰

7. Decision-Making Processes and Support Systems

The journey of family planning involves intricate decision-making processes, often undertaken jointly by couples, and relies heavily on access to accurate information, supportive counseling, and robust support networks. Understanding these elements is key to facilitating informed and autonomous choices.

7.1. Individual and Joint Decision-Making Dynamics

Family planning decisions are rarely made in a vacuum. They involve personal reflection, and for those in partnerships, complex interpersonal dynamics.

• Personal Values Clarification: Individuals often engage in a process of clarifying their personal values, beliefs, and life goals related to parenthood.¹³ Tools and methodologies for values clarification can help individuals explore their internal attitudes and biases, ensuring that choices align with deeply held convictions.⁴⁶ This process can be particularly important for navigating ambivalence about parenthood or making choices that may go against societal norms, such as remaining childfree.⁴⁸
• Couple Communication and Negotiation: For couples, open communication and negotiation are vital.¹ Differing desires regarding whether, when, or how many children to have can arise, necessitating discussions to reach a shared understanding and decision.¹ The quality of the relationship and the ability to communicate effectively about sensitive topics significantly influence this process.²²
• Shared Decision-Making (SDM) in Healthcare: In the context of contraceptive counseling, Shared Decision-Making (SDM) is an increasingly emphasized model.⁴⁵ SDM involves collaboration between the patient and provider, where the provider contributes medical knowledge and the patient shares their values and preferences, leading to a choice that best aligns with the patient’s goals.⁴⁵ Studies show that SDM in contraceptive counseling is associated with higher patient satisfaction with both the counseling process and the chosen method.⁴⁵

7.2. Informational Resources and Decision Aids

Access to comprehensive and unbiased information is crucial for informed family planning.

• Contraceptive Information: Individuals need detailed information about the range of available contraceptive methods, including their effectiveness, side effects, benefits, and how they align with personal health and lifestyle.⁵² Organizations like the Guttmacher Institute provide extensive research and fact sheets on contraception.⁵²
• Patient Decision Aids: These tools are designed to provide balanced, evidence-based information about various options, helping patients understand harms and benefits, clarify their values, and make choices consistent with their preferences.⁵¹ “My Birth Control” is an example of an online decision support tool that helps individuals select contraceptive methods aligned with their values and has been shown to improve knowledge and satisfaction with counseling.⁵⁴
• Information on Fertility, Adoption, and Childfree Living: Prospective parents or those considering alternatives need access to resources on fertility treatments ⁵⁵, the adoption process ⁵⁶, and information supporting the choice to live childfree.¹³ Websites like RESOLVE, the National Council for Adoption, and various childfree community platforms offer valuable information and support.⁵⁷
• Online Forums and Communities: Online forums, such as Reddit’s r/Fencesitter or r/childfree, provide spaces for individuals to share experiences, ask questions, and find peer support while navigating decisions about parenthood.⁵⁸ These platforms offer real-time perspectives but should be approached with an awareness of their unmoderated nature.⁵⁸

7.3. Counseling Services

Professional counseling can provide essential support and guidance throughout the family planning journey.

• Financial Counseling: Given the significant financial impact of raising children, financial counseling can help prospective parents create budgets, plan for expenses like childcare and education, review insurance coverage, and build savings.³² Services like “Budget for Baby” workshops or financial empowerment centers offer free or low-cost assistance.⁶² Title X family planning clinics also provide services regardless of ability to pay and can be a source of initial guidance.⁶⁴ The long-term financial costs associated with certain child-rearing needs, such as therapy for children with behavioral problems (e.g., ABA therapy), can also be substantial and may be a consideration for some families.⁶⁵
• Genetic Counseling: For individuals or couples with a family history of genetic conditions, a history of infertility or miscarriages, or those considering ART, genetic counseling provides information about potential risks and testing options.⁶⁷ Counselors help individuals understand genetic information and make informed decisions before or during pregnancy.⁶⁷
• Psychological and Emotional Support Counseling: The emotional and psychological aspects of family planning decisions can be profound.¹⁸ Therapists specializing in infertility, family planning, perinatal mental health, and ambivalence about parenthood can provide crucial support.¹⁸ Counseling can help individuals and couples navigate stress, anxiety, grief (in cases of infertility or loss), relationship challenges, and the complex emotions associated with choosing whether or not to have children.¹⁸ Unplanned pregnancies, for instance, can create significant mental and physical burdens, potentially leading to anxiety, depression, and postpartum depression.⁶⁹

7.4. Support Networks and Advocacy Groups

Social support and advocacy play a role in shaping the environment for family planning.

• Peer Support Groups: Organizations like RESOLVE offer peer-led and professionally-led support groups (both in-person and virtual) for individuals and couples dealing with infertility and various family-building options, providing a safe space to share experiences and find emotional support.⁵⁹
• Advocacy Organizations: Groups like the Center for Reproductive Rights and the Free the Pill coalition advocate for reproductive rights, access to contraception, and equitable healthcare.⁷⁴ These organizations work to address systemic barriers and promote policies that support informed family planning choices.
• Community and Online Support: Broader community support and online networks can offer valuable emotional backing and shared experiences, whether for new parents, those struggling with infertility, or individuals choosing a childfree life.¹³

The decision-making process in family planning is thus supported by a range of resources, from individual introspection and couple communication to professional counseling and broader community networks. Ensuring equitable access to these supports is vital for empowering individuals to make choices that align with their values, circumstances, and well-being.

8. Implications and Future Directions

The confluence of demographic shifts and evolving individual choices in family planning carries significant implications for American society, its economy, and the well-being of its citizens. Understanding these consequences and identifying areas for future inquiry and policy attention is crucial for navigating the path ahead.

8.1. Societal and Economic Implications of Current Trends

Current family planning trends—notably declining fertility rates, delayed parenthood, and rising childlessness—have multifaceted societal and economic repercussions.

• Economic Impacts:

• Shrinking Workforce and Slower Growth: Sustained sub-replacement fertility rates are projected to lead to a smaller working-age population in the coming decades.³ This can result in a smaller labor force, potentially slowing economic growth, reducing innovation, and diminishing the tax base needed to support public services and entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare.³ McKinsey projects that GDP per capita growth in advanced economies could slow significantly by 2050 due to these demographic shifts unless productivity dramatically increases or work patterns change.⁷
• Strain on Social Support Systems: An aging population, with a higher proportion of retirees relative to active workers (a falling support ratio), places increased pressure on pension systems, healthcare services, and long-term care infrastructure.⁵ Retirement systems may require substantial reforms to remain solvent.⁷
• Shifts in Consumption Patterns: An older population will shift consumption patterns, with increased demand for healthcare and services catering to seniors, and potentially decreased demand in sectors focused on younger demographics.⁷
• Societal Impacts:

• Changes in Family Structures and Intergenerational Dynamics: Smaller family sizes, more DINK households, and increased childlessness are altering traditional family structures.⁸ This can affect intergenerational support systems, caregiving responsibilities, and the social fabric of communities.⁶ For instance, with fewer adult children, the burden of elder care may fall on a smaller number of individuals or necessitate greater reliance on formal care systems.
• Impact on Social Institutions: Institutions like schools and universities may face declining enrollment due to fewer young people.⁶ Other community organizations and civic life could also be affected by changing demographics and family priorities.
• Individual Well-being and Life Choices: While delayed parenthood can offer economic advantages and opportunities for personal growth ¹⁰, it can also lead to increased medical risks and potential for involuntary childlessness.³⁶ The rising trend of choosing to be childfree reflects a diversification of life paths and definitions of fulfillment, but individuals making this choice may still face societal pressures.¹²
• Urban vs. Rural Dynamics: Urbanization is generally associated with lower fertility rates due to factors like higher costs of child-rearing and greater access to education and employment for women.³⁵ This can exacerbate demographic imbalances between urban and rural areas, with rural areas potentially facing more acute population decline if out-migration of young adults continues.⁷⁷ Urban planning decisions regarding housing density, green spaces, and amenities can also subtly influence household residential choices and, indirectly, family size considerations.³³

8.2. Psychological Impact of Societal Fertility Trends on Individual Choices

Broader societal fertility trends, such as declining birth rates or the increasing visibility of childfree lifestyles, can exert a psychological influence on individual family planning decisions, though this is a complex and multifaceted area.

• Normalization of Diverse Choices: As delaying parenthood and choosing to be childfree become more common and visible ⁴, these options may become more normalized and socially acceptable. This can reduce pressure on individuals to conform to traditional family timelines or structures, potentially alleviating anxiety for those who prefer alternative paths.¹³
• Ambivalence and Decision-Making Stress: Awareness of declining birth rates, coupled with economic uncertainties or environmental concerns, might contribute to ambivalence or anxiety about having children.¹⁸ The decision itself, regardless of the outcome, can be a source of significant psychosocial stress, particularly if it involves reconciling personal desires with perceived societal expectations or limitations.¹⁸
• Impact of Disparities: For individuals from communities experiencing significant disparities in family planning outcomes (e.g., higher rates of unintended pregnancy), the societal context can be particularly challenging.⁴⁰ The inability to control fertility as desired due to systemic barriers can lead to adverse mental health outcomes and perpetuate cycles of disadvantage.⁴⁰ The historical context of discriminatory practices can also create a legacy of distrust and heightened stress when engaging with family planning services.⁴⁰
• Seeking Support and Validation: In a climate of diverse and sometimes conflicting messages about family size and parenthood, individuals may increasingly seek out support groups, counseling, and online communities to validate their choices and navigate the emotional complexities of their decisions.⁴⁹

8.3. Policy Considerations

Addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by current family planning trends requires thoughtful policy interventions focused on supporting individuals and families, ensuring equity, and adapting societal structures.

• Reducing Barriers to Parenthood for Those Who Desire Children: Policies aimed at mitigating the high cost of raising children, such as affordable, high-quality childcare, expanded paid family leave, and direct financial support like enhanced child tax credits, can help individuals achieve their desired family size.⁵ Addressing broader economic insecurities and healthcare costs is also crucial.¹
• Ensuring Equitable Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Healthcare: This includes ensuring access to the full range of contraceptive methods, patient-centered counseling, and abortion services, particularly for underserved populations.²³ Policies should aim to eliminate financial and systemic barriers to care and address the social determinants of health that contribute to disparities.⁴⁰ The Guttmacher Institute and other organizations track legislative actions impacting access.⁵²
• Supporting Diverse Family Structures and Choices: Policies should recognize and support the growing diversity of family forms, including single-parent households, cohabiting couples with children, and LGBTQ+ families. This also means respecting and destigmatizing the choice to be childfree.¹³
• Adapting Social Systems to Demographic Realities: Given the likelihood of continued lower fertility and an aging population, social systems (healthcare, retirement, education) need to adapt.⁷ This may involve reforms to social insurance programs, investments in elder care, and strategies to enhance labor force participation and productivity among older adults. Immigration policy is also a relevant lever, though it presents its own complexities.⁷⁶
• Promoting Patient-Centered Care and Shared Decision-Making: Healthcare policies should continue to promote patient-centered approaches and SDM in family planning services, ensuring that individuals receive care that respects their values, preferences, and goals.⁴⁴

8.4. Future Research

Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of several evolving aspects of family planning:

• Long-Term Psychological Impacts of Childfree Choices: More research is needed on the long-term psychological well-being, life satisfaction, and social integration of individuals who choose to be childfree, across diverse demographic groups.
• Evolving Influence of Environmental Concerns: Longitudinal studies are needed to track how concerns about climate change and other global issues continue to shape reproductive intentions and behaviors, particularly among younger cohorts.
• Effective Strategies for Reducing Disparities: Continued investigation into the most effective interventions to reduce racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in family planning access, contraceptive uptake, and unintended pregnancy rates is critical. This includes evaluating culturally tailored approaches and systemic changes.
• Decision-Making in Diverse Cultural Contexts: Deeper qualitative and quantitative research is needed to understand family planning decision-making processes within the diverse cultural, religious, and immigrant communities in the U.S.
• Impact of Policy Changes: Ongoing evaluation of the impact of various state and federal policies (e.g., related to contraceptive access, abortion restrictions, parental leave, childcare subsidies) on family planning behaviors and outcomes is essential.
• Men’s Roles and Perspectives: While much research focuses on women, more investigation into men’s attitudes, involvement, and experiences related to family planning decisions is warranted.

8.5. Concluding Thought

Family planning decisions in the United States are made at the intersection of profound personal desires and a rapidly shifting societal, economic, and demographic landscape. The choices individuals make about whether, when, and how many children to have are deeply reflective of their values, aspirations, and the opportunities and constraints they perceive. As trends towards lower fertility, delayed parenthood, and diverse family structures continue, fostering an environment that supports informed, autonomous, and equitable decision-making for all individuals will remain a critical endeavor for a healthy and thriving society.

9. Conclusion

The decision-making landscape for family planning in the United States is characterized by its profound personal significance and its intricate connections to broader societal, economic, and demographic currents. This report has illuminated the multifaceted factors that individuals and couples navigate when considering whether to have children, how many to have, and when to embark on parenthood.

Current demographic trends reveal a nation undergoing significant transformation: fertility rates have fallen below replacement levels, the age of first-time mothers continues to rise, and an increasing share of adults are choosing to remain childfree or are childless by circumstance.³ These shifts are not arbitrary; they are the cumulative result of evolving personal priorities, including career and educational aspirations, desires for autonomy and specific lifestyles, and changing perceptions of health and well-being.¹

Societal and cultural influences further mold these decisions. Evolving views on marriage and gender roles, the complex interplay of religious beliefs and secularization, and growing concerns about the environment and the state of the world all contribute to the calculus of family planning.¹ Economic realities, particularly the substantial cost of raising children, the need for economic stability, and access to resources like affordable childcare and paid leave, serve as powerful determinants, often acting as significant barriers.¹

Crucially, access to family planning services and the outcomes of these decisions are not uniform. Persistent racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in unintended pregnancy rates, contraceptive use, and access to care highlight systemic inequities that demand ongoing attention and action.⁴⁰ Empowering individuals requires not only access to information and services but also a healthcare environment that embraces shared decision-making and respects diverse values and preferences.⁴⁵

The implications of these collective family planning choices are far-reaching, impacting economic growth, the viability of social support systems, community structures, and intergenerational dynamics.³ As the U.S. navigates a future shaped by these demographic realities, policies that support families, ensure reproductive autonomy, reduce disparities, and adapt social institutions will be paramount.

Ultimately, family planning is a journey of profound personal deliberation. Supporting individuals and couples in making informed, autonomous choices that align with their unique circumstances and aspirations is essential for both individual well-being and the broader health of society. Continued research and responsive policymaking will be vital to understanding and navigating the dynamic and deeply personal nature of these fundamental life decisions.

Works cited

1. 5 Key Factors Affecting Family Planning Decisions – Androcare Fertility Centre, accessed May 13, 2025, https://androcarefertilityng.org/5-key-factors-affecting-family-planning-decisions/
2. Overview of Family Planning in the United States – NCBI, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215219/
3. The Long-Term Decline in Fertility—and What It Means for State Budgets, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2022/12/the-long-term-decline-in-fertility-and-what-it-means-for-state-budgets
4. www.cdc.gov, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr74/nvsr74-3.pdf
5. So you want to increase your country’s birth rate? Experts say it’s …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/what-does-it-take-to-increase-birth-rates-experts-say-theres-no-magic-solution
6. The trends behind the historically low U.S. birth rate – CBS News, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trends-behind-historically-low-us-birth-rate-60-minutes/
7. Confronting the consequences of a new demographic reality …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/dependency-and-depopulation-confronting-the-consequences-of-a-new-demographic-reality
8. Rising Childlessness is Driving the Decline in Birth Rates in the …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.economicstrategygroup.org/publication/rising-childlessness/
9. Best age to get married, have a child, buy a home and retire? Here’s what Americans say, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/03/19/best-age-to-get-married-have-a-child-buy-a-home-and-retire-heres-what-americans-say/
10. The Effects of Motherhood Timing on Career Path – ResearchGate, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227187246_The_Effects_of_Motherhood_Timing_on_Career_Path
11. Growing share of childless adults in U.S. don’t expect to ever have …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/19/growing-share-of-childless-adults-in-u-s-dont-expect-to-ever-have-children/
12. The Experiences of U.S. Adults Who Don’t Have Children – Pew Research Center, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2024/07/25/the-experiences-of-u-s-adults-who-dont-have-children/
13. Navigating the Societal Pressures of Choosing a Childfree Life …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.relationalpsych.group/articles/navigating-the-societal-pressures-of-choosing-a-childfree-life
14. “It’s the Choices You Make That Get You There”: Decision-Making …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mfr/4919087.0018.102/–it-s-the-choices-you-make-that-get-you-there-decision-making?rgn=main;view=fulltext
15. DINKs and the American Dream | Institute for Family Studies, accessed May 13, 2025, https://ifstudies.org/blog/dinks-and-the-american-dream
16. DINK Lifestyle: 20 Financial Benefits – Under30CEO, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.under30ceo.com/dink-lifestyle-20-financial-benefits/
17. What Is Your Ideal Family Size? Personal Preference! – Stone Oak Counselors, accessed May 13, 2025, https://stoneoakcounselors.com/what-is-your-ideal-family-size/
18. Navigating Parenthood: A Guide to Prioritizing Mental Health and Family Planning, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.inspiredcounselingcenter.com/post/navigating-parenthood-a-guide-to-prioritizing-mental-health-and-family-planning
19. Family Planning for Women With a Chronic Illness | Pfizer, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/family_planning_for_women_with_a_chronic_illness
20. Chronic health conditions and pregnancy | March of Dimes, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.marchofdimes.org/find-support/topics/planning-baby/chronic-health-conditions-and-pregnancy
21. Americans want small families, aren’t … – Population Connection survey, accessed May 13, 2025, https://populationconnection.org/blog/survey-americans-want-small-families-arent-concerned-about-declining-birth-rates/
22. Family Dynamics – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560487/
23. Support children by empowering parents with family planning …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/support-children-by-empowering-parents-with-family-planning-resources/
24. Things to Consider before Having a Baby | WakeMed, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.wakemed.org/care-and-services/womens/pregnancy-and-childbirth/pregnancy-and-childbirth-resources/educational-resources/things-to-consider-before-having-a-baby
25. Socioeconomic and Cultural Influences on Contraceptive Use – The …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232120/
26. Pandemic perspectives: the temporal influence of COVID … – Frontiers, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1488014/full
27. Family Gender Roles | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/womens-studies-and-feminism/family-gender-roles
28. Faith and Fertility: Religious Perspectives on Family Planning – Inovi …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.inovifertility.com/blog/faith-and-fertility-religious-perspectives-on-family-planning/
29. Religion and Demography: Papal Influences on Fertility – Notre Dame Population Analytics, accessed May 13, 2025, https://populationanalytics.nd.edu/assets/606960/iyer_etal_wp_202501.pdf
30. How is climate change affecting family size decisions?, accessed May 13, 2025, https://populationconnection.org/blog/how-is-climate-change-affecting-family-size-decisions/
31. Climate change and sexual and reproductive health: what implications for future research?, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10444000/
32. Starting a family? Take these 10 steps to prepare financially | Fulton …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.fultonbank.com/Education-Center/Family-and-Finance/Financially-Prepare-to-Start-a-Family
33. Impact of urban planning on household’s residential decisions: An agent-based simulation model for Vienna – PubMed Central, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4461189/
34. Should you have children? A decision framework for a crucial life choice that affects yourself, your child and the world – GreaterWrong, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/ksmM82G4LRJCFQaHa/should-you-have-children-a-decision-framework-for-a-crucial
35. Environmental Impact of Urban vs. Rural Settings #ColgateScene – News, accessed May 13, 2025, https://news.colgate.edu/scene/2014/11/urban-legends.html
36. Factors Influencing the Delay in Childbearing: A Narrative Review …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10215553/
37. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood | Human Reproduction Update | Oxford Academic, accessed May 13, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/humupd/article/18/1/29/854296
38. www.nber.org, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w19493/w19493.pdf
39. “What if” you earned a diploma and delayed parenthood? | Child Trends, accessed May 13, 2025, https://cms.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/2014-27DelayedParenthood.pdf
40. Disparities in Family Planning – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2835625/
41. Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w17343/w17343.pdf
42. Characteristics of Women Receiving Family Planning Services at Title X Clinics — United States, 1991 – CDC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/Mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00023647.htm
43. Family Planning Impact of the Trump Foreign Assistance Freeze – Guttmacher Institute, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/2025/01/family-planning-impact-trump-foreign-assistance-freeze
44. Patient-Centered Care Explained with 5 Examples – ChartSpan, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.chartspan.com/blog/patient-centered-care-explained-with-examples/
45. Shared Decision Making in Contraceptive Counseling – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5466847/
46. Advancing Gender-Transformative Approaches in the UNFPA …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.unicef.org/media/156686/file/GTA%20Values%20Clarification%20Workshop%20Facilitation%20Guide.pdf
47. VALUES CLARIFICATION WORKSHOP: ACTIVITIES GUIDE – Reproductive Health Access Project |, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.reproductiveaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024-08-Values-Clarification-Workshop_Final.pdf
48. Loving and Struggling: How Ambivalence Shapes the Motherhood Experience, accessed May 13, 2025, https://themotherhoodcenter.com/blog/2024/11/05/loving-and-struggling-how-ambivalence-shapes-the-motherhood-experience/
49. Navigating the Choice to Be Childfree | Psychology Today, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/a-hut-of-her-own/202102/navigating-the-choice-to-be-childfree
50. Childfree? – The Baby Decision, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.thebabydecision.com/about-the-book/childfree/
51. Shared Decision-Making Strategies for Best Care: Patient Decision …, accessed May 13, 2025, https://nam.edu/perspectives/shared-decision-making-strategies-for-best-care-patient-decision-aids/
52. Contraception | Guttmacher Institute, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/united-states/contraception
53. Decision-making Tool for Family Planning Clients and Providers | Early Child Development, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.comminit.com/early-child/content/decision-making-tool-family-planning-clients-and-providers
54. My Birth Control | Person Centered Reproductive Health Program – UCSF, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pcrhp.ucsf.edu/my-birth-control
55. Infertility Resources and Reproductive Health Programs – ARC Fertility, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.arcfertility.com/patient-resources/useful-resources-infertility-links/
56. Finding Forever Families: A Step-by-Step Guide to Adoption, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.davethomasfoundation.org/resource/finding-forever-families-a-step-by-step-guide-to-adoption-us/
57. National Council For Adoption: Home, accessed May 13, 2025, https://adoptioncouncil.org/
58. Making the Choice: Top 5 Websites for Information on Living a Childfree Life Vs. Raising Kids, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.kidsorchildfree.com/post/making-the-choice-top-5-websites-for-information-on-living-a-childfree-life-vs-raising-kids
59. Find a Support Group | RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association, accessed May 13, 2025, https://resolve.org/get-help/support-groups/
60. Kids or No Kids — EA Forum – Effective Altruism Forum, accessed May 13, 2025, https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/YYnjHt5YzuHSH7oRR/kids-or-no-kids
61. Financial Counseling – Programs – Eskenazi Health, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.eskenazihealth.edu/programs/financial-counseling
62. Budget for Baby – Free Financial Planning Workshop | NMCRS (en-US), accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.nmcrs.org/our-services/budget-for-baby
63. Financial Empowerment Center – Family Service, accessed May 13, 2025, https://family-service.org/financial-empowerment-center/
64. About Title X Service Grants | HHS Office of Population Affairs, accessed May 13, 2025, https://opa.hhs.gov/grant-programs/title-x-service-grants/about-title-x-service-grants
65. What Is the Cost of ABA Therapy?, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.magnetaba.com/blog/cost-of-aba-therapy
66. Cost-effectiveness analysis of parenting interventions for the prevention of behaviour problems in children – PMC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6886776/
67. Genetic Counseling | Genomics and Your Health | CDC, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/genomics-and-health/counseling-testing/genetic-counseling.html
68. Genetic counseling | March of Dimes, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.marchofdimes.org/find-support/topics/planning-baby/genetic-counseling
69. Family Planning and Maternal Mental Health, accessed May 13, 2025, https://policycentermmh.org/family-planning/
70. Therapy for Fertility & Family Planning — Thrive Psychology Group, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.mythrivepsychology.com/fertility-alternative-family-planning
71. Find Infertility Therapists and Psychologists in Wilbraham, MA – Psychology Today, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/therapists/ma/wilbraham?category=infertility
72. Complex Family Planning | Patient Care – Weill Cornell Medicine, accessed May 13, 2025, https://weillcornell.org/services/obstetrics-and-gynecology/complex-family-planning
73. We Mothers Are Ultimately “There To Be Left” | Psychology Today, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/maternal-ambivalence/202504/we-mothers-are-ultimately-there-to-be-left
74. Free the Pill Coalition, accessed May 13, 2025, https://freethepill.org/coalition
75. Center for Reproductive Rights, accessed May 13, 2025, https://reproductiverights.org/
76. Social policy for a low-fertility future – Niskanen Center, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.niskanencenter.org/social-policy-for-a-low-fertility-future/
77. Growing Up in Rural America | RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.rsfjournal.org/content/8/3/1
78. Who Makes Planning Choices? | Urban Institute, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2023-08/Who%20Makes%20Planning%20Choices.pdf
79. Effects of Public Policy on Family Planning for Millennial Women in the United States, accessed May 13, 2025, https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=16534&context=dissertations
80. Psychosocial Consequences to Women of Contraceptive Use and Controlled Fertility – NCBI, accessed May 13, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235086/