General Motors AI Driven Transformation

Executive Summary

General Motors (GM) is in the midst of a profound, enterprise-wide transformation, leveraging artificial intelligence not as a siloed research project, but as the central nervous system for a re-engineered, software-defined automotive titan. The company’s strategy is a calculated response to the disruptive forces of electrification, autonomy, and intense global competition. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of GM’s multi-pronged AI strategy, its execution across the value chain, its competitive standing, and its ultimate potential to achieve a dominant position in the automotive industry.

GM’s approach is defined by pragmatic integration rather than high-risk, vertical innovation. Under the leadership of CEO Mary Barra and newly appointed Chief AI Officer Barak Turovsky, a veteran of Google and Cisco, GM is orchestrating a holistic AI implementation. This strategy is anchored by a deep, strategic alliance with NVIDIA, which provides the foundational compute hardware and simulation software for both GM’s factories and its vehicles. This partnership allows GM to de-risk its technology development and focus on its core competency: manufacturing at scale.

The company is deploying AI to create a formidable competitive moat in its industrial operations. Through the use of digital twins, predictive quality control systems, and AI-driven supply chain resilience tools, GM is enhancing efficiency, improving quality, and generating cost savings that can fund its more ambitious in-vehicle technology goals. This “smart factory” approach fortifies GM’s legacy strengths against tech-native rivals.

In the vehicle itself, GM has made a critical strategic pivot. Following the costly and troubled Cruise robotaxi venture, the company has recalibrated its autonomous vehicle strategy to focus on the expansion of its successful Super Cruise Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) and the long-term development of personal autonomous vehicles. This pragmatic shift provides a clearer and more immediate path to monetization through software subscriptions, generates a vast trove of real-world driving data, and allows GM to build consumer trust incrementally. This is complemented by AI applications in predictive maintenance and the optimization of the electric vehicle ecosystem, transforming the vehicle from a simple product into a platform for value-added services.

A competitive analysis reveals that GM is carving out a distinct middle path. It eschews Tesla’s high-risk, vision-only, full self-driving approach and Waymo’s capital-intensive, geographically-limited robotaxi model. Instead, GM is pursuing a scalable, monetizable ADAS strategy built on a multi-modal sensor philosophy and a foundation of powerful partner technology. While it currently lags Tesla in terms of its raw data fleet size, its deep integration of AI in manufacturing and its pragmatic go-to-market strategy for autonomy present a viable path to leadership.

However, the road to dominance is fraught with challenges. GM must successfully navigate a complex regulatory landscape, mitigate significant cybersecurity threats, and address profound ethical dilemmas. Its success will ultimately hinge on execution—its ability to foster an agile software culture, fully operationalize its partnership with NVIDIA, and win the war for top AI talent.

This report concludes that while GM may not dominate the field of pure AI research, it is strategically positioned to dominate the application of AI within the automotive industry. Its holistic, pragmatic, and execution-focused strategy represents a credible blueprint for transforming a legacy industrial giant into a leader of the AI-driven automotive future.

The Strategic Mandate: Re-engineering a Titan with AI

General Motors is not merely dabbling in artificial intelligence; it is fundamentally re-engineering its century-old business model around an AI core. The company’s strategy is a deliberate, top-down mandate to embed intelligent systems across every facet of its operations, from the earliest stages of research and development to the factory floor and the final customer experience. This transformation is built on three foundational pillars: a clear executive vision, new centralized leadership to execute that vision, and a deep strategic alliance to provide the technological backbone for scaled deployment.

The Barra Doctrine: Vision for a Software-Defined Future

The architect of this transformation is Chair and CEO Mary Barra, whose public statements outline a clear and consistent vision for GM’s future. She has repeatedly articulated the company’s evolution into a software-driven platform company, moving beyond the traditional model of simply selling vehicles and aftermarket parts.¹ Barra’s doctrine is one of merging technology with human ingenuity, harnessing AI to unlock new levels of innovation.³ This vision is not confined to a single product line; Barra has stressed that AI is central to the future of GM’s entire portfolio, encompassing electric vehicles (EVs), internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles, and autonomous systems.⁷

This approach is notably pragmatic. While competitors may focus on singular, futuristic goals, Barra’s messaging consistently grounds AI in tangible business benefits: enhancing safety, improving quality, and enabling efficiency.⁸ This realism, born from a deep understanding of the automotive industry’s long and complex product development cycles, informs a strategy built for sustainable, long-term integration rather than speculative, short-term bets.²

New Leadership for a New Era: The Role of the Chief AI Officer

To translate this vision into reality, GM made a landmark organizational move in March 2025, appointing Barak Turovsky as its first-ever Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer.⁷ This appointment signals a critical shift toward centralized governance and a unified AI strategy, a move that appears to be a direct lesson learned from the siloed and ultimately unsuccessful management of the Cruise subsidiary. Cruise operated as a “largely autonomous subsidiary” ¹⁶, a structure that fostered cultural clashes and a disconnect from GM’s core business, culminating in a high-profile failure that cost billions and damaged the company’s reputation in the autonomous space.¹⁷

The creation of a C-level AI officer is the classic organizational response to prevent such a failure from recurring. Turovsky’s role is to bring GM’s disparate AI initiatives—from manufacturing and supply chain to marketing and in-vehicle tech—under a single strategic umbrella, ensuring they are aligned with the CEO’s vision and anchored in solving real business problems.¹²

Turovsky’s background is perfectly suited to this task. As a veteran of Google, where he was Head of Product for Languages AI, and Cisco, where he was VP of AI, he brings deep expertise in scaling both consumer-facing and enterprise-level AI solutions.¹² His mandate is comprehensive: to shape GM’s AI vision, build a world-class AI team, and accelerate the integration of AI to enhance products, optimize operations, and improve the customer experience across all of GM’s projects.⁷ Reporting directly to the Senior Vice President of Software & Services Engineering, Turovsky’s position firmly embeds AI within GM’s core technology and product development hierarchy.⁷

The NVIDIA Alliance: A Partnership-Driven Path to Scale

The technological foundation of GM’s AI strategy is its deep and expanding collaboration with NVIDIA. Announced in March 2025, this alliance represents a deliberate strategic choice to leverage a best-in-class partner rather than attempt to replicate the full-stack, vertically integrated model of a competitor like Tesla.²² This partnership de-risks GM’s technological development, allowing it to access state-of-the-art AI compute and software platforms without the immense capital expenditure and development timelines required to build them from scratch. This frees GM to focus on its core competency: designing, engineering, and manufacturing vehicles at a global scale.³

The collaboration is multifaceted, providing the backbone for GM’s AI ambitions in both the factory and the vehicle:

• Industrial AI Backbone (Omniverse): GM is using the NVIDIA Omniverse™ platform to create sophisticated “digital twins” of its factories. This technology enables the virtual simulation, testing, and optimization of entire assembly lines before a single piece of physical equipment is installed. The goal is to drastically reduce costly downtime, accelerate the scaling of new production lines (especially for EVs), and improve overall manufacturing efficiency.³
• AI Model Training (GPUs & Cosmos): The partnership leverages NVIDIA’s market-leading GPUs for training GM’s proprietary AI models. The companies will also co-develop custom AI systems using platforms like NVIDIA Cosmos™ to train specialized models for manufacturing and robotics applications.³
• In-Vehicle Compute Brain (DRIVE AGX): Critically, GM will build its next-generation vehicles on the NVIDIA DRIVE AGX™ platform. Based on NVIDIA’s newest Blackwell architecture, this in-vehicle computer can deliver up to 1,000 trillion operations per second (TOPS) of performance while running the safety-certified NVIDIA DriveOS™.⁴ This provides the massive computational power required for advanced driver-assistance systems, sophisticated in-cabin AI experiences, and the eventual deployment of personal autonomous vehicles.²³

This partnership-driven approach represents a pragmatic transformation strategy. GM is not trying to become a semiconductor company. Instead, it is acting as a “smart integrator,” combining its profound automotive expertise with the world’s leading AI compute platform to create a powerful, scalable, and financially sound path toward an AI-driven future.

Value Chain Stage	AI Initiative/Application	Key Technology/Platform	Strategic Goal
R&D / Product Development	AI-powered battery materials discovery	Mitra Chem’s AI platform, Machine Learning	Accelerate development of affordable, high-performance EV batteries (e.g., LMFP); build a U.S. supply chain.29
	Generative design for vehicle parts	AI-based design processes, 3D printing	Create lighter, stronger, and more customizable vehicle components, improving performance and efficiency.30
Supply Chain & Logistics	Predictive supply chain risk management	“Supplier Home Dashboard” (proprietary ML tool)	Proactively identify at-risk suppliers, mitigate disruptions, and build the industry’s most agile supply chain.21
	EV charging network optimization	Predictive analytics, geospatial algorithms	Identify optimal locations for public EV chargers to alleviate range anxiety and support EV adoption.11
Manufacturing & Operations	Digital twins for factory simulation	NVIDIA Omniverse™, Hexagon Simufact	Virtually design, test, and optimize assembly lines before construction to reduce downtime, cut costs, and scale faster.8
	Predictive quality control	Proprietary AI tools, Robotics, Machine Learning	Inspect welds and paint; detect battery pack leaks to enhance vehicle quality, safety, and reliability.8
In-Vehicle Technology & Product	Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS)	Super Cruise, NVIDIA DRIVE AGX™	Provide a safe, reliable, and scalable hands-free driving experience with a clear path to monetization and future autonomy.23
	Predictive vehicle maintenance	Machine Learning analysis of vehicle diagnostic data	Proactively detect potential component failures before they occur to enhance customer loyalty and reduce warranty costs.21
Customer Experience & Marketing	Personalized marketing at scale	Adobe Real-Time CDP, Adobe Firefly (GenAI)	Unify customer data to deliver personalized marketing campaigns, accelerating audience building by 50%.42
	AI-powered virtual assistants	Google Cloud conversational AI, Generative AI	Enhance the in-cabin experience with natural language assistants for navigation, vehicle controls, and information.30

The Smart Factory: AI as the Bedrock of Manufacturing Excellence

While much of the public focus in the automotive AI race is on the intelligence inside the car, General Motors is building a foundational competitive advantage by embedding AI deep within its industrial operations. The company is leveraging AI not merely for incremental efficiency gains but to fundamentally transform its manufacturing and supply chain into a smart, predictive, and resilient ecosystem. This industrial AI strategy creates a powerful competitive moat that is difficult for tech-native rivals to replicate and generates the operational excellence and cost savings needed to fund more ambitious product-facing AI initiatives.

The Digital Twin Revolution: Simulating Before Building

At the core of GM’s smart factory strategy is the aggressive adoption of digital twin technology. A digital twin is a dynamic, virtual replica of a physical asset, process, or system that is continuously updated with real-world data.⁴⁴ GM is using this technology to create comprehensive virtual models of its production lines before they are physically built, a “simulate before building” approach that is revolutionizing its manufacturing planning and execution.⁸

The collaboration with NVIDIA and its Omniverse platform is central to this effort. Omniverse allows GM engineers to build and simulate entire factories, individual production lines, and specific work cells in a photorealistic, physics-accurate virtual environment.⁹ This enables them to test layouts, simulate robotic movements, validate workflows, and identify potential bottlenecks or ergonomic issues long before any capital is spent on physical construction.⁸ The benefits are substantial: reduced downtime during launch, accelerated scaling of production, significant cost savings, and an enhanced ability for employees to identify and solve problems more effectively.⁸

A concrete case study with Hexagon demonstrates the tangible, engineering-level value of this approach. GM and Hexagon collaborated to create and validate a digital twin for the Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) process using Hexagon’s Simufact Welding software.³⁵ The simulation was able to accurately predict the complex thermo-mechanical behavior of the welding process, including transient temperature gradients and the resulting physical distortion of the parts. The simulated results showed excellent agreement with physical measurements from thermocouples and 3D laser scans.³⁵ This validation gives GM engineers the confidence to optimize critical parameters like clamping design and welding sequences virtually, dramatically reducing the need for expensive and time-consuming physical prototypes and rework on the factory floor.³⁵

From Quality Control to Predictive Quality: The AI Inspector

GM is deploying AI to move its quality control processes from a reactive, end-of-line inspection model to a proactive, integrated, and predictive system. This involves using a combination of advanced robotics and proprietary AI tools to monitor production in real-time and identify potential defects with superhuman precision.⁸

Key applications include:

• Weld and Paint Inspection: AI-powered computer vision systems are used to inspect every weld and the final paint coat on vehicles. These systems can identify subtle irregularities and anomalies that might be missed by human inspectors, ensuring a higher and more consistent level of quality.⁸
• EV Battery Pack Leak Detection: For its growing EV lineup, GM has developed a system that combines AI and machine learning to quickly and accurately pinpoint potential leaks in battery packs.⁸ Given the critical importance of battery safety and quality, this AI-driven inspection is a crucial capability that supports GM’s electrification goals.

GM leadership emphasizes that this is a “people-centric” application of technology.⁸ The goal is not to replace the skilled workforce but to augment their capabilities, freeing them to focus on complex problem-solving and craftsmanship while automating repetitive and ergonomically stressful tasks.⁸

Building a Resilient Supply Chain: AI as an Early Warning System

The modern automotive supply chain is a sprawling, global network fraught with potential disruptions. GM’s supply chain alone comprises approximately 27,000 suppliers and over 100,000 unique part numbers, spanning 124 countries.³¹ To manage this immense complexity, GM is using predictive AI to transform its supply chain from a reactive system to a proactive and resilient one.

The centerpiece of this effort is a proprietary machine learning tool GM calls the “Supplier Home Dashboard”.³¹ This system functions as an early warning network. It continuously analyzes billions of data points and words from myriad sources, using machine learning to identify leading indicators that a supplier might be at risk of disruption. The tool provides real-time risk ratings for every supplier in the network, allowing GM’s supply chain team to focus its attention on the highest-risk partners and proactively implement mitigation strategies.³¹

The practical value of this system has already been proven. David Leich, GM’s Executive Director of Global Supply Chain, recounted an instance where the tool found intelligence that a supplier was about to close its doors abruptly. The system immediately alerted the GM team, which was able to identify the affected Tier 1 partners—many of whom were unaware of the impending shutdown—and quickly work to prevent a major production disruption.³¹

This application of AI is central to GM’s stated goal of building the “most agile supply chain” in the industry, which it views as a critical competitive differentiator, particularly during the volatile transition to electric vehicles.³¹ By using AI to illuminate risks as early as possible, GM can gain the time needed to mitigate them, ensuring a more seamless and reliable flow of parts to its factories.

The Intelligent Vehicle: Redefining the Driving Experience

Beyond the factory walls, General Motors is deploying AI to redefine the vehicle itself and the ecosystem surrounding it. The company’s product-facing AI strategy is marked by a significant and pragmatic recalibration of its autonomous driving ambitions, coupled with a determined push to use data and AI to create a more proactive, convenient, and personalized ownership experience. This transforms the vehicle from a static piece of hardware into an intelligent, evolving platform for software and services.

The Post-Cruise Pivot: A Pragmatic Approach to Autonomy

GM’s journey in autonomous vehicles (AVs) provides a stark lesson in the perils of high-risk innovation. The company invested more than $8 billion in its majority-owned subsidiary, Cruise, with the ambitious goal of deploying a fleet of fully autonomous, Level 5 robotaxis.¹⁶ However, the venture was beset by immense challenges. The path to scaling a commercial robotaxi business proved to be incredibly capital-intensive and fraught with technical and regulatory hurdles.¹⁹ A series of safety incidents, culminating in a widely publicized October 2023 event where a Cruise vehicle dragged a pedestrian, led to a complete suspension of its driverless permit by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) amid allegations that the company had concealed details of the crash.¹⁶

In late 2024, facing mounting losses and a damaged reputation, GM made a decisive strategic pivot. The company announced it would cease funding Cruise’s robotaxi business and instead refocus its efforts on the development of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) for personally owned vehicles, with a long-term goal of launching personal autonomous vehicles (PAVs).¹⁸

This recalibration is not a retreat from autonomy but a shift to a more pragmatic and monetizable path. GM is now doubling down on its successful Super Cruise system, which was the world’s first truly hands-free ADAS for compatible highways.³⁸ The strategy is to aggressively expand Super Cruise’s capabilities—adding features like automatic lane changes and hands-free trailering—and its operational domain, with plans to cover about 750,000 miles of roads in North America.²⁴ This Level 2+ system has a clear go-to-market strategy and an established revenue model through vehicle options and subscriptions, allowing GM to build a profitable software business today.²³ This approach generates immediate revenue and populates a massive fleet of sensor-equipped vehicles that gather valuable data for future development, all while incrementally building consumer trust in automated technology. The long-term vision of a fully autonomous PAV remains, but the path to achieving it is now an evolutionary one, powered by the formidable compute capabilities of the NVIDIA DRIVE AGX platform.⁶

The Proactive Vehicle: AI-Powered Predictive Maintenance

A cornerstone of GM’s strategy to add value through software is its push into AI-powered predictive maintenance. The goal, as articulated by GM’s Chief Data and Analytics Officer Jon Francis, is to “spot car trouble before drivers do”.²¹ This initiative leverages the immense amount of data flowing from GM’s fleet of connected vehicles.

The system works by analyzing petabytes of diagnostic trouble code (DTC) data that is generated whenever a vehicle system reports an issue, even minor ones that don’t trigger a “check engine” light.²¹ By applying machine learning algorithms to this vast dataset, GM can identify subtle patterns and correlations that are precursors to component failures. This allows the system to predict potential issues with critical components like batteries, engines, and transmissions before the driver is even aware of a problem.²¹

The strategic impact is twofold. For GM, it promises to significantly reduce warranty-related costs by addressing issues before they escalate into major, expensive repairs. More importantly, for the customer, it transforms the ownership experience. Instead of dealing with the frustration and inconvenience of an unexpected breakdown, a customer can be proactively notified by GM to schedule a service visit at their convenience. This shifts vehicle maintenance from a reactive, negative experience to a proactive, value-added service, which is a powerful tool for building brand loyalty and customer satisfaction.²¹

The Connected Ecosystem: AI Beyond the Car

GM’s AI strategy extends beyond the vehicle itself to the broader ecosystem that supports it, particularly for electric vehicles. The company is using AI to address key pain points of EV ownership and to create a more seamless and personalized customer journey.

• Optimizing EV Charging Infrastructure: Range anxiety remains a significant barrier to EV adoption. To combat this, GM is using AI to strategically guide the expansion of its public charging network, which it is building in collaboration with partners like EVgo and Pilot Flying J.³³ GM’s data scientists employ predictive analytics and geospatial algorithms to analyze a host of variables, including EV traffic patterns, proximity to existing chargers, and other socio-geographic data.¹¹ This data-driven approach treats site selection as a mathematical optimization problem, ensuring that new chargers are placed in the most impactful locations to best support customer needs.³³
• Personalizing the Customer Journey: GM is undergoing a major transformation in its marketing and customer engagement, moving from a traditional product-centric model to a highly personalized, customer-centric approach. This is powered by a suite of Adobe Experience Cloud solutions, including the Adobe Real-Time CDP (Customer Data Platform) and Adobe’s generative AI, Firefly.⁴² This platform allows GM to unify customer data from across its brands and channels to create real-time, personalized customer journeys. The implementation has already yielded significant results, accelerating the time required to build audiences and predictive models by 50%.⁴²
• Enhancing the In-Cabin Experience: Looking ahead, GM is actively exploring the integration of generative AI to create more powerful and intuitive in-vehicle virtual assistants. CEO Mary Barra has spoken about the potential for a ChatGPT-like assistant that can understand and respond to complex, natural language queries, moving far beyond the capabilities of current voice command systems.⁴³ This effort is supported by a collaboration with Google Cloud to deploy its conversational AI technologies in GM vehicles.³⁰

Competitive Landscape: The AI Arms Race

General Motors is not executing its AI strategy in a vacuum. It is engaged in a high-stakes competition with a diverse set of rivals, from fellow legacy automakers to nimble, tech-native disruptors. Each competitor is pursuing a distinct strategy, underpinned by different technological philosophies and business models. An analysis of GM’s position relative to these key players reveals the unique trade-offs and strategic bets that will define the future of the automotive industry.

GM vs. Tesla: The Integrator vs. The Visionary

The rivalry between GM and Tesla represents a fundamental clash of strategies.

• Technology Stack: GM’s approach is defined by strategic integration. It employs a multi-modal sensor suite for its vehicles—combining cameras, radar, and, for higher levels of autonomy, likely lidar—and powers its systems with a partner’s (NVIDIA’s) world-class compute platform.⁶ This allows GM to leverage best-in-class technology without bearing the full R&D burden. Tesla, in stark contrast, is the ultimate vertical integrator. It famously pursues a “vision-only” strategy, asserting that a combination of cameras and a powerful neural network is sufficient to solve autonomous driving.⁴⁸ This is powered by its own custom-designed AI hardware, software, and its Dojo supercomputer, built specifically for training its AI models.⁴⁸
• Strategy and Data: GM is now on a pragmatic, evolutionary path, aiming to scale its L2+ Super Cruise ADAS across its vehicle lineup while developing personal autonomous vehicles for the future.²³ Tesla’s goal is more revolutionary: to solve Level 5 “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) and deploy a fleet of autonomous robotaxis.⁴⁸ Central to Tesla’s strategy is its massive data advantage. With millions of vehicles on the road, it has collected an unparalleled volume of real-world driving data, which it believes is essential for training an AI that can handle the infinite “edge cases” of driving.⁴⁸ While GM’s data collection from its Super Cruise fleet is growing, it is smaller in scale. GM seeks to offset this by leveraging the powerful simulation capabilities afforded by its NVIDIA partnership.²⁴

GM vs. Waymo: Personal Vehicle vs. Robotaxi Fleet

The comparison with Waymo, Google’s autonomous vehicle subsidiary, highlights a divergence in business models.

• Business Model: Following its pivot away from Cruise, GM’s primary focus is on selling ADAS-equipped personal vehicles directly to consumers.²⁴ Waymo, conversely, is committed to the robotaxi model. It operates its own fleet of Level 4/5 autonomous ride-hailing vehicles, offering services within carefully defined and mapped geographic areas (geofences).⁵²
• Technology and Mapping: Both companies use a multi-modal sensor approach, but Waymo’s technology is heavily dependent on two key elements: multiple, high-resolution lidar sensors, which it considers indispensable for safety and accuracy, and extremely detailed, high-definition maps of its operational areas.⁵² This reliance on pre-mapping makes Waymo’s system robust within its domain but difficult to scale to new locations. GM’s Super Cruise also relies on mapped data, but for a much wider network of compatible highways, giving it a broader, though less granular, operational design domain.³⁸ This strategic trade-off is central: Waymo pursues near-perfection in a limited area, while GM pursues broad availability of a less autonomous system.

GM vs. Ford: The Legacy Automaker Derby

The most direct comparison for GM is its traditional rival, Ford. Both legacy automakers are pursuing broadly similar, pragmatic AI strategies. They are leveraging AI to enhance manufacturing efficiency, build more resilient supply chains, and offer predictive maintenance services.⁵⁷ In the vehicle, GM’s Super Cruise and Ford’s BlueCruise are head-to-head competitors in the L2+ hands-free ADAS market.³⁸ Both companies also publicly espouse a commitment to a human-centric and ethical deployment of AI.⁸ The ultimate winner in this rivalry will likely be determined by execution. Key differentiators will include the depth and effectiveness of their technology partnerships—GM’s alliance with NVIDIA appears to be more deeply integrated across its entire value chain—and the speed at which they can innovate and deploy new AI-powered features and services.²²

Performance Under Scrutiny: California DMV Disengagement Reports

The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) requires companies testing autonomous vehicles on public roads to submit annual disengagement reports. A “disengagement” occurs when the autonomous system is deactivated, either by the human safety driver or by the system itself due to a failure or an inability to handle a situation.⁶¹ While this data is an imperfect metric—companies have discretion in how they define a disengagement, and driverless miles have no disengagements by definition—it offers one of the few public, quantitative benchmarks for real-world testing performance.⁶¹

Autonomous Driving Technology Competitive Matrix

Company	Primary AV Product	SAE Level Target	Sensor Suite Philosophy	Mapping Strategy	Primary Business Model
General Motors	Super Cruise / Personal AVs	L2+ evolving to L4	Multi-modal (Camera, Radar, Lidar for higher levels)	Mapped compatible road network (scalable)	ADAS subscriptions; sale of personally owned AVs.24
Tesla	Full Self-Driving (FSD)	L2+ evolving to L5	Vision-only (Cameras)	Relies on navigation maps; aims for generalized “no-map” capability	One-time FSD purchase or subscription; future robotaxi network.48
Waymo	Waymo One	L4/L5	Multi-modal (Lidar-heavy, Camera, Radar)	High-Definition (HD) pre-mapping of geofenced areas	Operating a proprietary ride-hailing (robotaxi) service.52
Ford	BlueCruise	L2+	Multi-modal (Camera, Radar)	Mapped compatible road network (scalable)	ADAS subscriptions; sale of equipped personal vehicles.57

California DMV Disengagement Report Summary (2024 Data: Dec 2023 – Nov 2024)

Company	Total Miles Driven (Autonomous)	Miles with Safety Driver	Driverless Miles	Total Disengagements	Miles per Disengagement (Safety Driver Miles)
Waymo	2,906,137	2,389,565	516,572	191 (Driver) + 21 (System) = 212	~11,271
Zoox	1,012,358	951,871	60,487	4 (Driver)	~237,968
Nuro	210,815	210,544	271	N/A (Data not specified in source)	N/A
WeRide	60,946	60,192	754	2 (Driver)	~30,096

Source:.⁶¹ Note: Miles per disengagement is calculated for safety-driver miles only. Disengagement definitions vary by company. Cruise discontinued operations and is not listed for this period.

This competitive analysis reveals a fundamental strategic divergence in the industry regarding the most valuable type of data for achieving autonomy. Tesla is betting everything on the sheer volume of unstructured, real-world data from its consumer fleet, believing this is the only path to solving the infinite edge cases of driving. Waymo is betting on the quality and fidelity of highly structured data from its advanced sensor suite within controlled, pre-mapped environments, believing this is the only path to guaranteeing safety. GM, post-Cruise, is now charting a middle course. Its Super Cruise system relies on a form of structured data (mapped compatible roads) but is designed for a much broader operational domain than Waymo’s geofenced cities. GM’s path to dominance hinges on its ability to prove that this “structured but scalable” data approach, powerfully augmented by NVIDIA’s simulation capabilities, can deliver a product that is safer, more reliable, and more profitable than Tesla’s ambitious but unpredictable vision and Waymo’s safe but geographically constrained service.

Navigating the Gauntlet: Overcoming External Hurdles

General Motors’ pursuit of AI dominance will not be determined solely by its internal strategy and competitive execution. The company must also successfully navigate a gauntlet of formidable external challenges that will shape the entire industry. These include a rapidly evolving regulatory landscape, profound ethical questions that strike at the heart of public trust, and the ever-present threat of sophisticated cybersecurity attacks. GM’s ability to master these external factors will be as critical as its technological prowess.

The Regulatory Maze: The 2025 NHTSA Framework

For years, the development of autonomous vehicles in the United States has been hampered by a lack of clear federal regulation, leading to a confusing “patchwork of state laws”.⁶⁴ In a significant development, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) unveiled a new AV Framework in April 2025, with the stated goals of slashing red tape, promoting innovation, and moving toward a single national standard while prioritizing safety.⁶⁵

This new framework introduces three key changes that directly impact GM’s strategy:

1. Streamlined Crash Reporting: The previous requirement to report a broad range of AV incidents has been narrowed. Reporting is now focused on more severe crashes, such as those involving fatalities, hospitalizations, or airbag deployments. Minor incidents for Level 2 systems no longer require reporting, and less severe crashes for Level 3-5 systems are reported monthly rather than immediately.⁶⁴ This allows regulators and companies to focus on the most critical safety trends.
2. Expanded Data Confidentiality: Manufacturers are now able to classify more crash-related details—such as the AV’s operational status and the software version in use—as confidential business information (CBI). This is intended to protect the billions of dollars invested in proprietary software and algorithms from competitors.⁶⁴
3. Expanded Testing Exemptions: The Automated Vehicle Exemption Program (AVEP), which allows for the testing of vehicles that do not meet certain legacy Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS)—such as those without a steering wheel or pedals—has been expanded to include domestically produced vehicles. Previously, this program favored foreign manufacturers.⁶⁴

This new regulatory environment acts as a significant tailwind for GM’s post-Cruise, ADAS-first strategy. The framework creates a clearer and less burdensome regulatory path for the development and testing of Level 2 and Level 3 driver-assistance systems and non-commercial personal autonomous vehicles. This directly benefits the very systems, like Super Cruise, that GM is currently scaling and monetizing. It allows GM to advance its products within a more defined regulatory structure, while competitors still focused on the L5 robotaxi moonshot face a more complex and less certain path to broad commercial deployment.

The Trust Algorithm: Ethics and Cybersecurity

Beyond regulation, GM must win the battle for public trust, which hinges on navigating complex ethical and cybersecurity challenges.

• Ethical Dilemmas: The entire AV industry is grappling with unresolved ethical questions that have profound societal implications. The most famous of these is the “Trolley Problem,” which forces a choice of how an AV should prioritize lives in an unavoidable crash scenario.⁶⁸ However, the ethical landscape extends far beyond this thought experiment to include issues of algorithmic bias (ensuring AI does not unfairly disadvantage certain demographic groups), data privacy (managing the vast amounts of personal data collected by vehicles), and establishing clear lines of accountability and liability in the event of an accident.⁶⁸ While GM has stated commitments to ethical AI, translating these principles into auditable, transparent, and fair code is a monumental challenge that will be critical for long-term public acceptance.³²
• Cybersecurity Threats: The modern software-defined vehicle is a “computer on wheels,” making it a highly attractive target for malicious actors.⁷⁴ The attack surface is vast, with vulnerabilities present in infotainment systems, diagnostic ports (OBD-II), vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication channels, and over-the-air (OTA) software update mechanisms.⁷⁵ A successful cyberattack could range from data theft to the remote control of critical vehicle functions like braking and steering, with potentially catastrophic consequences.⁷⁴ AI plays a dual role in this domain: the AI systems themselves can be attacked, but AI is also a primary defense mechanism. AI-powered intrusion detection systems (IDS) are essential for monitoring vehicle networks in real-time, identifying anomalous patterns, and neutralizing threats before they can cause harm.⁷⁷ For GM, securing its entire fleet of connected vehicles, which are built on a complex web of proprietary and partner-supplied software, will be a perpetual and paramount challenge.

Verdict and Strategic Recommendations

General Motors has embarked on one of the most ambitious transformations in its history, aiming to leverage artificial intelligence to secure a dominant position in the future of mobility. An exhaustive analysis of its strategy, operational execution, competitive positioning, and the external landscape reveals a credible, albeit challenging, path to achieving this goal. The final verdict on GM’s potential for dominance requires a nuanced definition of the term and a clear-eyed assessment of its strengths and weaknesses.

Defining “Dominance”: Beyond Technical Specs

For a legacy automaker like General Motors, “dominance” in the AI era will not be defined by being the first to achieve a technical milestone like Level 5 autonomy. Such a narrow focus overlooks the immense complexity of manufacturing, scaling, and profitably operating millions of vehicles. Instead, true dominance will be demonstrated by the ability to successfully and holistically integrate AI across the entire value chain to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. This means using AI to attain:

• Superior Manufacturing Efficiency and Quality: Building better vehicles, faster and at a lower cost than competitors.
• Unmatched Supply Chain Resilience: Navigating global disruptions with greater agility and foresight.
• A Profitable and Scalable Software Business: Generating significant, recurring revenue from AI-powered in-vehicle services and features.
• A Trusted and Valued Customer Experience: Leveraging data and AI to build loyalty and deliver services that enhance the entire ownership lifecycle.

Dominance, for GM, is a game of execution and profitability, not just a race to the most advanced research prototype.

SWOT Analysis

• Strengths:

• Manufacturing Prowess Augmented by AI: GM’s century of manufacturing experience is a core asset, now being fortified with industrial AI like digital twins and predictive quality, creating a moat that is difficult for tech-first companies to cross.⁸
• Pragmatic and Monetizable ADAS Strategy: The pivot from the high-risk Cruise robotaxi to the scalable, revenue-generating Super Cruise system provides a stable and financially sound path toward higher levels of autonomy.²³
• Strategic Alliance with NVIDIA: The deep partnership with the undisputed leader in AI compute de-risks GM’s technology stack and provides access to state-of-the-art hardware and software.³
• Clear Executive Mandate: A unified vision from the CEO and a centralized AI leadership structure under a new Chief AI Officer provide clear direction and governance.⁷
• Weaknesses:

• The Shadow of Cruise: The public failure of the Cruise venture has damaged GM’s reputation in the AV space and raises questions about its ability to manage high-tech, software-centric projects.¹⁸
• Cultural Transformation: Shifting the culture of a 100-year-old industrial giant to embrace the speed, agility, and risk tolerance of a software-first mindset is an immense and ongoing challenge.¹⁰
• Data Fleet Disadvantage: Compared to Tesla, which has millions of vehicles gathering real-world driving data, GM’s data collection fleet for advanced AI training is currently smaller, a potential disadvantage in developing robust neural networks.⁴⁸
• Opportunities:

• Leverage New Regulatory Framework: The 2025 NHTSA framework creates a favorable environment for GM to accelerate the development and deployment of its ADAS and personal AV technologies.⁶⁴
• Industrial AI as a Funding Engine: The cost savings and efficiency gains from its smart factory initiatives can be used to fund the capital-intensive R&D required for next-generation vehicle AI, creating a self-sustaining innovation flywheel.⁸
• Define the Personal Autonomous Vehicle Market: By focusing on PAVs rather than robotaxis, GM has the opportunity to define and lead a potentially massive new market segment for consumer-owned autonomous vehicles.²⁴
• Threats:

• Intense and Asymmetric Competition: GM faces fierce competition from tech-native rivals like Tesla and Waymo, which possess different strengths in software development, data collection, and AI research.⁴⁸
• Cybersecurity Catastrophe: A major, successful cyberattack on GM’s fleet of connected vehicles could have devastating consequences for safety, brand trust, and financial stability.⁷⁴
• Technological Leapfrogging: There remains a risk that a competitor could achieve a sudden, dramatic breakthrough in L4/L5 autonomy that renders GM’s more evolutionary approach obsolete.

Final Verdict

General Motors is not positioned to dominate the field of artificial intelligence in the same way as a pure technology company like Google or NVIDIA. It will not win the race to create artificial general intelligence.

However, General Motors is strategically positioned to potentially dominate the application of AI within the global automotive industry. Its strategy is a well-reasoned, pragmatic, and holistic plan that plays to its inherent strengths as a manufacturing titan while intelligently de-risking its weaknesses in pure technology development through a cornerstone partnership. The decision to pivot from the robotaxi moonshot to a scalable ADAS and PAV strategy is a sign of mature, disciplined leadership focused on building a viable, profitable business.

The path to dominance is plausible but far from guaranteed. It hinges almost entirely on flawless execution. Can the new Chief AI Officer successfully unify the company’s disparate AI efforts and instill a truly data-driven culture? Can the deep and complex partnership with NVIDIA be operationalized effectively across dozens of factories and vehicle platforms without disruption? Can GM win the fierce global war for top AI and software talent against the allure of Silicon Valley? The answers to these questions will determine GM’s fate.

Strategic Recommendations

To solidify its position and increase its probability of achieving market dominance, General Motors should consider the following strategic actions:

1. Aggressively Market the “Industrial AI Flywheel”: GM should create a clear and compelling public narrative that explicitly links the cost savings and efficiency gains from its industrial AI initiatives to the funding of its advanced vehicle technologies. This “flywheel” concept—where smart factories build better cars and fund smarter software—would demonstrate a sustainable, self-reinforcing innovation model that is highly attractive to investors and differentiates GM from competitors who are simply burning cash on R&D.
2. Win the Talent War with a Hybrid Model: GM must recognize that it cannot compete for top AI talent using traditional automotive compensation and organizational structures. It should empower its Chief AI Officer to build a world-class, centralized AI organization that operates with a distinct, more agile culture—a “tech company within the car company.” This would involve offering competitive, tech-industry-level compensation and creating a work environment that can attract and retain elite AI researchers and engineers who might otherwise choose to work at a company like Google or Tesla.
3. Lead on Trust through Radical Transparency: GM should move beyond simply stating ethical principles and take a leadership position in building public trust. This could involve establishing a public, independent ethical review board for its autonomous systems, partnering with leading cybersecurity firms to conduct and publish regular security audits of its vehicle platforms, and championing industry-wide standards for AI safety and data privacy. By proactively addressing these concerns, GM can turn a potential vulnerability into a powerful brand differentiator.
4. Maintain a “Skunkworks” for the L4/L5 Future: While the pragmatic focus on ADAS is the correct strategy for today, GM must not be caught flat-footed if a competitor achieves a breakthrough in full autonomy. The company should maintain a dedicated, well-funded, and agile R&D team—a “skunkworks”—that is firewalled from the main product development cycle and tasked with exploring the frontiers of L4/L5 technology. This ensures that GM retains the institutional knowledge and technical capability to pivot quickly if the competitive landscape undergoes a sudden and dramatic shift.

Works cited

1. Cybersecurity in Autonomous Vehicles: A Comprehensive Review Study of Cyber-Attacks and AI-Based Solutions – International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, accessed June 18, 2025, https://ijettjournal.org/archive/ijett-v72i1p111
2. GM CEO Mary Barra Talks EV Strategy, Software Future & Ultium at …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0VWmxLTqc4
3. ‘I need clarity, and then I need consistency’: GM’s Mary Barra on steering through tariffs, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.semafor.com/article/04/23/2025/i-need-clarity-and-then-i-need-consistency-gms-mary-barra-on-steering-through-tariffs
4. General Motors and NVIDIA Collaborate on AI for Next-Generation Vehicle Experience and Manufacturing, accessed June 18, 2025, https://resources.nvidia.com/en-us-manufacturing-industry-resources/general-motors-and-nvidia-collaborate-on-ai
5. General Motors and NVIDIA Collaborate on AI for Next-Generation Vehicle Experience and Manufacturing – Nvidia Investor Relations, accessed June 18, 2025, https://investor.nvidia.com/news/press-release-details/2025/General-Motors-and-NVIDIA-Collaborate-on-AI-for-Next-Generation-Vehicle-Experience-and-Manufacturing/default.aspx
6. GM, NVIDIA team up to revolutionize vehicles through artificial …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://san.com/cc/gm-nvidia-team-up-to-revolutionize-vehicles-through-artificial-intelligence/
7. General Motors and NVIDIA Collaborate on AI for Next-Generation Vehicle Experience and Manufacturing, accessed June 18, 2025, https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/general-motors-and-nvidia-collaborate-on-ai-for-next-generation-vehicle-experience-and-manufacturing
8. GM names its first-ever chief AI officer | Automotive Dive, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.automotivedive.com/news/general-motors-names-first-chief-ai-officer-barak-turovsky/741566/
9. Using AI to revolutionize manufacturing at General Motors, accessed June 18, 2025, https://news.gm.com/home.detail.html/Pages/topic/us/en/2025/mar/0311-ai.html
10. How GM is using AI to boost quality, safety, and efficiency in auto plants, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.emergingtechbrew.com/stories/2025/04/07/gm-ai-quality-safety-efficiency-auto-plants
11. Mary Barra: “I’m Not In a Startup, But a Start-Over” | Stanford Graduate School of Business, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/mary-barra-im-not-startup-start-over
12. GM hires AI expert to drive innovation in vehicles | Digital Watch Observatory, accessed June 18, 2025, https://dig.watch/updates/gm-hires-ai-expert-to-drive-innovation-in-vehicles
13. A New Era for AI at GM: Welcoming Barak Turovsky as Chief AI Officer – AIM Councils, accessed June 18, 2025, https://council.aimresearch.co/a-new-era-for-ai-at-gm-welcoming-barak-turovsky-as-chief-ai-officer/
14. General Motors Appoints Barak Turovsky as Chief AI Officer – CDO Magazine, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.cdomagazine.tech/leadership-moves/general-motors-appoints-barak-turovsky-as-chief-ai-officer
15. GM appoints Barak Turovsky as first Chief AI Officer to drive tech innovation – CBT News, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.cbtnews.com/gm-appoints-barak-turovsky-as-first-chief-ai-officer-to-drive-tech-innovation/
16. GM appoints its first chief AI officer – CIO Dive, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.ciodive.com/news/GM-chief-AI-officer-barak-turovsky/741575/
17. Cruise (autonomous vehicle) – Wikipedia, accessed June 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruise_(autonomous_vehicle)
18. GM invests another $850M into Cruise as it expands manual operations – The Robot Report, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.therobotreport.com/gm-invests-another-850m-into-cruise-as-it-expands-manual-operations/
19. GM to stop funding troubled Cruise autonomous vehicle unit …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/gm-stop-funding-troubled-cruise-autonomous-vehicles-robotaxis-san-francisco/
20. GM cuts 50% of Cruise staff after ending robotaxi business : r/SelfDrivingCars – Reddit, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/comments/1ihokcc/gm_cuts_50_of_cruise_staff_after_ending_robotaxi/
21. Independent investigation uncovers systemic issues in GM’s Cruise division – CBT News, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.cbtnews.com/independent-investigation-uncovers-systemic-issues-in-gms-cruise-division/
22. GM Wants AI to Spot Car Trouble Before Drivers Do — CDAO Jon Francis Reveals How, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.cdomagazine.tech/opinion-analysis/gm-wants-ai-to-spot-car-trouble-before-drivers-do-cdao-jon-francis-reveals-how
23. Carmakers rev up AI efforts amid economic uncertainty – CIO Dive, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.ciodive.com/news/automotive-industry-AI-strategy-use-case-tariff-economy/748633/
24. Is GM-NVIDIA AI Partnership a Turning Point for GM Roadmap …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://futurumgroup.com/insights/is-gms-ai-bet-with-nvidia-a-turning-point-for-its-vehicle-and-factory-roadmap/
25. GM’s path to the future gets an AI infusion from NVIDIA | General Motors Company, accessed June 18, 2025, https://investor.gm.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gms-path-future-gets-ai-infusion-nvidia/
26. GM and Nvidia Partner on AI Technology | ASSEMBLY, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.assemblymag.com/articles/99130-gm-and-nvidia-partner-on-ai-technology
27. NVIDIA AI Powers GM’s Next-Gen Vehicles and Smart Manufacturing | NVDA Stock News, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.stocktitan.net/news/NVDA/general-motors-and-nvidia-collaborate-on-ai-for-next-generation-rfqd3chpkzno.html
28. GM, Nvidia to partner on AI tech for factories and next-gen vehicles – Automotive Dive, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.automotivedive.com/news/gm-partner-with-nvidia-ai-technology-drive-agx-omniverse/742977/
29. General Motors and NVIDIA Collaborate on AI for Next-Generation Vehicle Experience and Manufacturing : r/MVIS – Reddit, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MVIS/comments/1jebkwb/general_motors_and_nvidia_collaborate_on_ai_for/
30. GM Invests in AI and Battery Materials Innovator Mitra Chem …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://investor.gm.com/news-releases/news-release-details/gm-invests-ai-and-battery-materials-innovator-mitra-chem/
31. General Motors Company – Digital Transformation Strategies – GlobalData, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/general-motors-company-enterprise-tech-analysis/
32. How GM is boosting resiliency through predictive AI tools …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.automotivelogistics.media/digital-technology/how-gm-is-boosting-resiliency-through-predictive-ai-tools/46133.article
33. Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Transportation | General Motors, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.gm.com/company/growth-strategy/artificial-intelligence
34. GM Taps AI, Machine Learning to Expand EV Charging Network in U.S., accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.publicpower.org/periodical/article/gm-taps-ai-machine-learning-expand-ev-charging-network-us
35. How GM is using AI to expand America’s EV charging network, accessed June 18, 2025, https://news.gm.com/home.detail.html/Pages/topic/us/en/2025/jan/0108-ai-ev.html
36. General Motors validates digital twin | Hexagon, accessed June 18, 2025, https://hexagon.com/resources/resource-library/general-motors-validates-digital-twin
37. GM expands AI-driven manufacturing to enhance quality, safety, and efficiency – CBT News, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.cbtnews.com/gm-expands-ai-driven-manufacturing-to-enhance-quality-safety-and-efficiency/
38. How GM Uses AI to Advance Production – Thomasnet, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/general-motors-ai-manufacturing/
39. GM | Zero Congestion with Self-driving Vehicles, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.gm.com/innovation/autonomous-driving
40. Super Cruise for Select Vehicles – Chevrolet, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.chevrolet.com/super-cruise
41. 11 gen AI use cases in automotive industry – Lumenalta, accessed June 18, 2025, https://lumenalta.com/insights/11-gen-ai-use-cases-in-automotive-industry
42. General Motors: AI Use Cases 2024 – PitchGrade, accessed June 18, 2025, https://pitchgrade.com/companies/general-motors-ai-use-cases
43. General Motors pioneers new ways to fuel zero-friction experiences, accessed June 18, 2025, https://business.adobe.com/blog/general-motors-pioneers-new-ways-to-fuel-zero-friction-experiences
44. General Motors looking to weave artificial intelligence into the driving experience, accessed June 18, 2025, https://mobility21.cmu.edu/general-motors-looking-to-weave-artificial-intelligence-into-the-driving-experience/
45. What is Digital Twin in Manufacturing? 10 Inspiring Industry Examples, accessed June 18, 2025, https://litslink.com/blog/what-is-digital-twin-in-manufacturing-inspiring-industry-examples
46. Digital Twins in Automotive Manufacturing: Dynamic Virtual Models Advantages, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.ediweekly.com/digital-twins-in-automotive-manufacturing-dynamic-virtual-models-advantages/
47. Revolutionizing connected vehicle manufacturing: The power of digital twin in automotive, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.netscribes.com/revolutionizing-connected-vehicle-manufacturing-the-power-of-digital-twin-in-automotive/
48. GM Ditches Cruise to Work on Autonomous Vehicles – Cities of the Future, accessed June 18, 2025, https://citiesofthefuture.eu/gm-ditches-cruise-to-work-on-autonomous-vehicles/
49. 10 Ways Tesla Is Using AI [Case Study] [2025] – DigitalDefynd, accessed June 18, 2025, https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/tesla-using-ai-case-study/
50. Tesla, Waymo, Ford – Where are we with self-driving cars? – Supercar Blondie, accessed June 18, 2025, https://supercarblondie.com/self-driving-cars-mercedes-tesla-waymo-ford-gm/
51. Tesla’s AI Patents: The Data Behind Its Self-Driving & AI Innovations …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://patentpc.com/blog/teslas-ai-patents-the-data-behind-its-self-driving-ai-innovations
52. The AV Software Market: Who’s Winning the Race for the Best Self-Driving AI? (Growth Stats) | PatentPC, accessed June 18, 2025, https://patentpc.com/blog/the-av-software-market-whos-winning-the-race-for-the-best-self-driving-ai-growth-stats
53. How our cars drive – Waymo One Help, accessed June 18, 2025, https://support.google.com/waymo/answer/9190838?hl=en
54. Self-Driving Car Technology for a Reliable Ride – Waymo Driver, accessed June 18, 2025, https://waymo.com/waymo-driver/
55. Waymo Expands Its Self-Driving Service Throughout California. Here’s Everything to Know, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/waymo-expands-its-self-driving-service-throughout-california-heres-everything-to-know/
56. Comparing Autonomous Driving Systems by Top Brands (If you Dare) – StartMotionMedia, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.startmotionmedia.com/comparing-autonomous-driving-systems-by-top-brands-if-you-dare/
57. Tesla Robotaxi vs. Waymo vs. Cruise: Here’s How They Stack Up, accessed June 18, 2025, https://insideevs.com/news/736709/tesla-robotaxi-waymo-cruise/
58. 5 ways Ford is using AI [Case Study] [2025] – DigitalDefynd, accessed June 18, 2025, https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/ford-using-ai-case-study/
59. Inside Ford’s Strategic Push for a Digital Future – Supply Chain World, accessed June 18, 2025, https://scw-mag.com/news/inside-fords-strategic-push-for-a-digital-future/
60. The Trust Algorithm – Further with Ford 2024 | Ford Motor Company, accessed June 18, 2025, https://corporate.ford.com/microsites/ford-trends-2024/the-trust-algorithm.html
61. Ford Motor in artificial intelligence: Theme innovation strategy – Just Auto, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.just-auto.com/data-insights/ford-motor-in-artificial-intelligence-theme-innovation-strategy-2/
62. 2024 Disengagement Reports from California – The Last Driver …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://thelastdriverlicenseholder.com/2025/02/03/2024-disengagement-reports-from-california/
63. Disengagement Reports – California DMV – CA.gov, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/disengagement-reports/
64. 2023 Disengagement Reports from California – The Last Driver License Holder, accessed June 18, 2025, https://thelastdriverlicenseholder.com/2024/02/03/2023-disengagement-reports-from-california/
65. New Federal Laws Targeting Self-Driving Vehicle Safety in 2025 …, accessed June 18, 2025, https://roborace.com/self-driving-safety-laws/
66. NHTSA unveils new autonomous vehicle regulations to ‘prevent patchwork of state laws’, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.repairerdrivennews.com/2025/04/28/nhtsa-unveils-new-autonomous-vehicle-regulations-to-prevent-patchwork-of-state-laws/
67. Trump’s Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy Unveils New Automated Vehicle Framework as Part of Innovation Agenda, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/trumps-transportation-secretary-sean-p-duffy-unveils-new-automated-vehicle-framework
68. Federal Government Announces Less Stringent Rules for Autonomous Vehicles, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.asashop.org/2025/04/25/federal-government-announces-less-stringent-rules-for-autonomous-vehicles/
69. Autonomous Vehicle Ethical Considerations – Meegle, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.meegle.com/en_us/topics/autonomous-vehicles/autonomous-vehicle-ethical-considerations
70. AI Ethics in Autonomous Vehicles: Balancing Safety and Decision-Making – Fpga Insights, accessed June 18, 2025, https://fpgainsights.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-ethics-in-autonomous-vehicles/
71. Ethics in the Driver’s Seat: Unravelling the Ethical Dilemmas of AI in Autonomous Driving, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.sae.org/publications/technical-papers/content/2024-01-2023/
72. ennoventure.com, accessed June 18, 2025, https://ennoventure.com/blogs/ai-in-automotives-driving-innovation-or-posing-risks-to-the-automobile-industry/#:~:text=While%20AI%20drives%20innovation%2C%20it,threatening%20both%20safety%20and%20trust.
73. AI in Automotives – Driving Innovation or Posing Risks to the Automobile, accessed June 18, 2025, https://ennoventure.com/blogs/ai-in-automotives-driving-innovation-or-posing-risks-to-the-automobile-industry/
74. The Ethics of AI in Transportation: Balancing Safety, Privacy, and Fairness – Numalis, accessed June 18, 2025, https://numalis.com/ethics-of-ai-in-transportation-safety-privacy-fairness/
75. Connected cars drive into a cybersecurity crisis – Help Net Security, accessed June 18, 2025, https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2025/04/04/cybersecurity-risks-cars/
76. Cyber security for autonomous vehicles – IEC e-tech, accessed June 18, 2025, https://etech.iec.ch/issue/2025-02/cyber-security-for-autonomous-vehicles
77. Emerging Cybersecurity Risks in Connected Vehicles, With Focus On In-Vehicle and Vehicle-Edge Platforms – Semiconductor Engineering, accessed June 18, 2025, https://semiengineering.com/emerging-cybersecurity-risks-in-connected-vehicles-with-focus-on-in-vehicle-and-vehicle-edge-platforms/
78. AI in Automotive Cybersecurity: Securing Connected Vehicles, accessed June 18, 2025, https://horizonconnect.de/ai-in-automotive-cybersecurity/