Decision-Making for Family Planning in United States: A Comprehensive Analysis

1. Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the multifaceted factors influencing family planning decisions in the United States. Family planning, encompassing choices about whether and when to have children, and the number of children to have, is a critical aspect of individual well-being and public health. This analysis reveals that these decisions are shaped by a complex interplay of individual knowledge and beliefs, socioeconomic circumstances, cultural and social norms, access to and quality of healthcare, psychological and relational dynamics, as well as legal and ethical considerations. The report highlights significant disparities in family planning access and outcomes across different demographic groups, underscoring the need for targeted interventions and policy changes. Key recommendations focus on enhancing access to affordable and comprehensive family planning services, promoting informed decision-making through patient-centered counseling, and addressing the systemic barriers that contribute to existing inequities.

2. Introduction

Defining Family Planning in the US Context: Family planning in the United States encompasses the personal and often shared decisions individuals and couples make regarding their reproductive lives. This includes the choice to have children or not, the desired number of children, and the timing and spacing of births.¹ Achieving these goals often involves the use of various contraceptive methods and techniques to manage fertility and control the timing of reproduction.¹ Furthermore, family planning also includes access to services and information related to achieving pregnancy, as well as addressing issues of infertility.²

Importance of Family Planning for Individual and Public Health: The ability of individuals to make informed decisions about their family size and the timing of births has profound implications for both personal and public health. Effective family planning contributes to significant decreases in infant and child mortality rates.² It also plays a crucial role in improving the social and economic well-being of women and their families, creating opportunities for educational and career advancement.² Moreover, family planning is directly linked to enhanced maternal health outcomes by allowing women to plan pregnancies when they are physically and emotionally prepared.² By enabling individuals to control their fertility, family planning significantly reduces the risk of unintended pregnancies, which are associated with a range of adverse health behaviors during pregnancy, such as delayed prenatal care and substance use, ultimately impacting the health of both the mother and the child.² Beyond health benefits, access to family planning fosters economic independence and contributes to overall well-being.² It also prevents pregnancy-related health risks, particularly for adolescent girls who face higher rates of complications.⁸ Optimal birth spacing, facilitated by family planning, has been shown to lead to healthier outcomes for both mothers and their infants.⁵

Scope of the Report: This report aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the diverse factors that influence family planning decisions within the United States. It analyzes these factors across multiple levels, including individual characteristics, socioeconomic circumstances, cultural and social norms, the role of healthcare access and quality, psychological and relational dynamics, as well as the legal and ethical landscape. Furthermore, the report identifies existing disparities in family planning decisions and outcomes across various population groups within the US. It also explores different methodologies for supporting informed decision-making in this context and highlights the persistent challenges and barriers that hinder effective family planning for many individuals. Ultimately, this analysis leads to a set of recommendations aimed at improving access to family planning services and promoting equity in reproductive health outcomes.

3. Individual-Level Factors in Family Planning Decisions

Knowledge about Contraception and Reproductive Health: A fundamental aspect of family planning decision-making is an individual’s understanding of contraception and reproductive health. Awareness of the various contraceptive methods available, along with their effectiveness in preventing pregnancy, is crucial for making informed choices.⁸ However, research indicates that a lack of basic understanding about different contraceptives exists within the population.¹¹ Furthermore, inaccurate knowledge and prevalent misconceptions regarding the potential side effects of contraception represent significant barriers to its use.¹² A poor understanding of the female reproductive cycle and the periods of fertility can also contribute to less effective use of contraceptive methods.¹² The varying levels of knowledge observed across individuals suggest a critical need for targeted and easily accessible educational resources that can empower people with accurate information to make informed decisions about their reproductive health. If individuals lack fundamental knowledge about contraception, their ability to make well-informed decisions or utilize the most effective methods for their needs is significantly diminished. This knowledge gap can be influenced by a multitude of factors, including an individual’s level of formal education, their cultural background, and their access to reliable and comprehensive information. These disparities in knowledge can ultimately lead to inequities in family planning outcomes across different segments of the population.

Individual Beliefs and Attitudes towards Family Size and Timing: Personal preferences play a significant role in determining an individual’s ideal family size.¹⁶ Beliefs about the various benefits associated with family planning, such as the ability to raise healthy and well-supported children and the potential for economic advantages through planned family size, also heavily influence these decisions.¹¹ An individual’s overall attitude towards pregnancy, whether positive, negative, or somewhere in between, can significantly impact their motivation to use contraception.⁷ The fundamental desire for children and the perceived likelihood and personal appeal of experiencing pregnancy are also key factors that individuals weigh when making family planning choices.¹² Individual attitudes are not formed in a vacuum; rather, they are shaped by a complex interplay of personal values, deeply ingrained cultural norms, and prevailing socioeconomic circumstances. A person’s upbringing, their specific religious beliefs, and their current economic situation can all contribute to their desired family size and the preferred timing of having children. Therefore, gaining a thorough understanding of these individual beliefs is absolutely essential for healthcare providers to offer truly patient-centered family planning counseling that respects and aligns with the individual’s personal values and reproductive goals.

Perceived Benefits and Risks of Different Contraceptive Methods: Concerns about potential side effects and perceived health risks associated with various contraceptive methods constitute significant barriers to their widespread use.⁷ The perceived characteristics of different contraceptives, such as their ease of use, their overall effectiveness in preventing pregnancy, and any additional health benefits they may offer, all play a crucial role in an individual’s choice of method.¹² The fear of experiencing negative side effects can lead individuals to either rely on less effective methods of contraception or to forgo their use altogether.¹⁷ Providing accurate and comprehensive information about both the benefits and the potential risks associated with different contraceptive methods is therefore critically important for overcoming prevalent misconceptions and empowering individuals to make well-informed choices that align with their personal health needs and preferences. If individuals harbor unfounded fears or have inaccurate information about certain contraceptive methods, they may avoid using them, even if those methods are the most effective options available for their specific circumstances. Healthcare providers have a vital role in proactively addressing these concerns by providing clear, evidence-based information and engaging in open and honest discussions with their patients.

Personal Health Considerations: A person’s overall health status, their age, and the frequency of their sexual activity are important factors that influence their choice of birth control methods.⁸ The individual’s desire to have children in the future is also a key consideration that guides their family planning decisions.⁸ Furthermore, a family history of certain diseases can also play a role in the selection of appropriate contraceptive methods.⁸ Family planning decisions are deeply personal and should be carefully tailored to each individual’s unique health circumstances and their specific reproductive goals. A standardized, “one-size-fits-all” approach to family planning is unlikely to be effective in meeting the diverse needs of the population. Therefore, healthcare providers must take into account each individual’s unique health profile, including any pre-existing medical conditions, their lifestyle, and their future family aspirations, when recommending and discussing different contraceptive methods.

4. Socioeconomic Influences on Family Planning

Impact of Socioeconomic Status (SES) on Access to and Utilization of Family Planning Services: Socioeconomic status has a profound impact on an individual’s ability to access and utilize family planning services in the United States. Lower SES is consistently associated with decreased access to healthcare in general, and this includes essential family planning services such as contraception and counseling.⁷ Studies have shown that women with lower income levels and lower levels of educational attainment are significantly less likely to receive necessary family planning services compared to their higher-SES counterparts.⁶ A critical barrier contributing to this disparity is the lack of adequate insurance coverage for contraception, which disproportionately affects individuals with lower SES.⁶ The direct cost of contraceptives and family planning services can also be a major financial concern, preventing many individuals from accessing the care they need.⁶ Furthermore, limited access to publicly funded family planning services, which are designed to serve low-income populations, can also exacerbate these inequalities.⁶ These socioeconomic disparities create significant obstacles to accessing essential family planning resources, ultimately perpetuating cycles of disadvantage within vulnerable communities. Individuals with lower incomes may face the challenge of not being able to afford contraception on a regular basis, or they may lack reliable transportation options to reach healthcare clinics where these services are provided. This limited access can lead to higher rates of unintended pregnancies and births within these communities, further contributing to existing socioeconomic inequalities.

Correlation of SES with Family Size Preferences and Unintended Pregnancies: Socioeconomic factors not only affect access to family planning services but also have a strong correlation with family size preferences and the likelihood of experiencing unintended pregnancies. Research consistently demonstrates that lower SES is associated with a higher risk of unintended pregnancies, unintended births, and abortions.⁷ Teenage pregnancy rates are also significantly higher among individuals and communities with lower SES.⁷ Specifically, women with lower levels of education and income are more likely to experience unintended pregnancies throughout their reproductive years.⁷ Interestingly, studies suggest that women with lower SES may perceive the ideal age to start a family as being younger compared to women with higher SES, which could contribute to earlier childbearing and potentially a greater number of children over their lifetime.⁷ These findings indicate that socioeconomic factors play a crucial role not only in determining access to family planning resources but also in shaping individuals’ desires and expectations regarding family size and the timing of parenthood, ultimately influencing the prevalence of unintended pregnancies. Economic insecurity and limited educational opportunities might lead individuals in lower SES groups to have children earlier in life or to desire larger families due to various factors, such as the perceived need for support in old age or different perspectives on the opportunity costs associated with raising children.

SES and Contraceptive Use Patterns: Patterns of contraceptive use also vary significantly based on socioeconomic status. Studies have found that women from minority groups and those with lower SES are generally less likely to use contraception overall compared to their white and higher-SES counterparts, and when they do use contraception, they tend to rely on less effective methods.⁷ Furthermore, even when using the same method of contraception, women with lower incomes experience higher rates of contraceptive failure.⁷ For example, research has indicated that a significantly higher percentage of women earning below the Federal Poverty Level experience a pregnancy within the first year of using oral contraceptives compared to women with higher incomes.⁷ Method choice also differs by SES, with women of lower SES being more likely to rely on permanent methods like female sterilization and less likely to use highly effective reversible methods such as oral contraceptives.⁷ These disparities in contraceptive use patterns based on SES directly contribute to the observed differences in unintended pregnancy rates across different socioeconomic groups. If individuals with lower SES have less access to comprehensive information about and the financial resources for more effective contraceptive methods, they are more likely to experience method failure or to rely on less effective options, ultimately leading to higher rates of unintended pregnancies.

Table 1: Socioeconomic Disparities in Family Planning Outcomes

⁷5. Cultural and Social Norms Shaping Family Planning Choices

Influence of Cultural Beliefs and Religious Views: Cultural norms and traditions exert a significant influence on individuals’ decisions regarding family planning. These norms often dictate the appropriate time to start a family and the socially acceptable number of children to have, sometimes creating pressure for early and frequent childbearing.⁷ Religious beliefs also play a crucial role in shaping attitudes towards contraception and abortion, with varying doctrines and interpretations influencing individual choices and behaviors.⁷ Furthermore, societal values surrounding gender roles and familial duties can significantly impact a woman’s autonomy in making decisions about her reproductive health.²² Within the diverse cultural and religious landscape of the United States, there exist conflicting views on sexuality and the appropriate context for childbearing, which further complicate family planning decisions.²⁴ This rich tapestry of cultural and religious perspectives leads to a wide range of beliefs and practices regarding family planning, ultimately impacting individual choices and access to relevant services. Healthcare providers need to be acutely aware of and sensitive to these cultural nuances when providing family planning counseling to ensure they are offering culturally competent and respectful care.

Community Expectations and Familial Influences: Family planning decisions are often shaped by the expectations of the surrounding community and the influence of family members. Community expectations and peer pressure can significantly impact an individual’s choices regarding family size and their willingness to use contraception.¹² Similarly, familial expectations regarding the timing of marriage, the number of children to have, and the spacing between births can also play a substantial role in these decisions.¹² In many relationships, male partners exert a strong influence on a woman’s contraceptive use, highlighting the importance of considering both partners’ perspectives in family planning.¹² Conversely, supportive relationships with parents, friends, and healthcare professionals can positively influence an individual’s contraceptive choices and their overall approach to family planning.³² These observations underscore the fact that social networks and interpersonal relationships wield considerable influence over individual family planning decisions. A woman’s decision about whether or not to use contraception, for instance, might be significantly influenced by her partner’s preferences, her family’s deeply held expectations, and the prevailing views of her close friends and community members. Therefore, addressing these complex social influences can be an important aspect of promoting informed and autonomous choices in family planning.

Gender Roles and Women’s Autonomy: Societal values surrounding traditional gender roles and the perceived familial duties of women can often limit their autonomy in making decisions about their reproductive health.²² In many cultures, norms that prioritize male preferences for having large families can directly restrict a woman’s decision-making power regarding crucial aspects of family planning, such as pregnancy spacing and the use of contraception.²² Furthermore, societal expectations often place the primary burden of family planning responsibilities on women, requiring them to navigate healthcare appointments, obtain contraception, and ensure its consistent use.³³ These observations highlight the fact that gender inequality and deeply ingrained traditional gender roles can create significant barriers to women’s reproductive autonomy and their ability to make independent and self-directed family planning decisions. In certain cultural contexts, women may lack the power to freely decide whether or when to have children or to utilize contraception, underscoring the critical need for interventions and societal shifts that actively promote gender equality in all aspects of reproductive health.

6. The Role of Healthcare Access and Quality

Availability and Accessibility of Family Planning Services: The availability and accessibility of family planning services are fundamental to enabling individuals to make informed reproductive choices. Unfortunately, the unavailability of a diverse range of contraceptive methods and comprehensive family planning services in many healthcare facilities remains a significant barrier to utilization.⁶ Geographic challenges, particularly the significant distance that individuals in rural areas and those living in designated “contraceptive deserts” must travel to reach healthcare providers, further limit access to these essential services.²⁰ Additionally, inconvenient clinic locations and operating hours can create substantial hurdles for individuals with demanding work schedules or limited flexibility.⁶ The lack of reliable transportation options also poses a significant barrier, especially for low-income individuals and those living in areas with inadequate public transportation.²⁰ Ensuring the widespread availability and accessibility of comprehensive family planning services, particularly in historically underserved areas and communities facing significant logistical challenges, is absolutely crucial for effectively meeting the diverse reproductive health needs of all individuals across the United States. If people cannot easily and conveniently access a healthcare clinic or obtain the contraception they need, their ability to plan their families effectively and achieve their reproductive goals is severely compromised. This necessitates a concerted effort to address logistical barriers such as transportation limitations and inflexible clinic schedules.

Affordability of Family Planning Services: The affordability of family planning services, including the cost of contraception itself, remains a major challenge for many individuals in the United States.⁶ The lack of adequate insurance coverage for contraception significantly exacerbates these financial challenges, particularly for those without employer-sponsored health plans or those with inadequate coverage.⁶ The steadily rising costs of both contraceptive supplies and advanced medical technology place an increasing strain on the financial resources of family planning clinics, potentially limiting the services they can offer.³⁴ Affordability is a critical determinant of access to essential family planning services, underscoring the urgent need for policies and programs that ensure that the cost of care is not a prohibitive barrier for any individual seeking to manage their reproductive health. If contraception and comprehensive family planning services are prohibitively expensive, individuals, especially those with low incomes or limited financial resources, will inevitably be unable to access them, leading to higher rates of unintended pregnancies and a range of other negative health and socioeconomic outcomes.

Quality of Family Planning Services and Contraceptive Counseling: The quality of family planning services and the effectiveness of contraceptive counseling play a pivotal role in empowering individuals to make informed reproductive decisions and utilize contraception effectively. Research indicates that insufficient information and inadequate guidance from healthcare workers regarding contraceptive use contribute to lower rates of contraceptive adoption.¹¹ A lack of proper counseling on the correct and consistent use of various contraceptive methods can also lead to covert or incorrect use among women.¹¹ Furthermore, instances of inaccurate and inappropriate provision of critical family planning information have been reported.¹¹ Negative attitudes exhibited by some healthcare workers can also deter women from seeking essential family planning care.¹¹ Alarmingly, studies have revealed that some healthcare providers themselves may possess inaccurate or incomplete knowledge about different contraceptive methods.³⁶ In contrast, patient-centered counseling, which prioritizes understanding an individual’s unique needs, preferences, and reproductive goals, is essential for promoting informed choices and positive outcomes.⁵ High-quality counseling includes comprehensive communication about potential side effects of different methods and the implementation of effective strategies to promote consistent contraceptive continuation and adherence.³⁶ The quality of counseling and the attitudes of healthcare providers have a profound impact on an individual’s ability to make informed decisions about their reproductive health and to use contraception safely and effectively. If healthcare providers fail to offer accurate, unbiased information in a supportive and patient-centered manner, individuals may hesitate to use contraception altogether or may opt for less effective methods based on misinformation or fear. Therefore, ongoing training and the provision of adequate resources for healthcare providers in the area of family planning are absolutely essential to ensure high-quality care for all individuals.

Range of Available Contraceptive Methods: The availability of a comprehensive range of contraceptive methods within healthcare facilities significantly influences both the utilization of these services and an individual’s ultimate choice of method.² Unfortunately, some clinics may have limitations in the variety of contraceptive options they offer to patients.¹¹ Ensuring that publicly funded clinics offer the full spectrum of reversible birth control methods is a crucial step in meeting the diverse needs of the population.⁶ Access to a wide array of contraceptive methods empowers individuals to select the option that best aligns with their specific health needs, personal preferences, lifestyle, and reproductive goals. Different individuals have varying medical histories, personal values, and levels of comfort with different types of contraception. Therefore, it is imperative that clinics offer a comprehensive range of methods, including short-acting reversible contraceptives (like pills, patches, and rings), long-acting reversible contraceptives (like IUDs and implants), barrier methods (like condoms), and permanent options (like sterilization), to ensure that everyone can find a suitable and acceptable option.

7. Psychological and Relational Factors in Family Planning

Influence of Mental Health on Family Planning Decisions and Outcomes: Mental health plays a significant and often overlooked role in family planning decisions and their subsequent outcomes. Research has shown that the presence of depressive symptoms can predict contraceptive behaviors that are more likely to lead to unintended pregnancy.⁴³ Furthermore, mental health disorders have been associated with a higher likelihood of individuals experiencing subsequent abortions.⁴³ While generally safe and effective, hormonal contraception may impact the mental health of some individuals, highlighting the importance of considering this potential link during counseling.⁹ Experiencing unintended pregnancies can create significant mental and physical burdens on individuals, potentially leading to negative health outcomes for both the mother and the baby.⁶ Additionally, the experience of infertility and the often-stressful treatments associated with it can cause considerable psychological stress, anxiety, and depression for both individuals and couples.⁴⁵ These findings underscore the fact that mental health is intricately linked to various aspects of family planning, affecting not only contraceptive use but also the overall experience of pregnancy, childbirth, and infertility. Individuals who are grappling with mental health challenges may face difficulties in adhering to consistent contraception use or may be more susceptible to the psychological impact of unintended pregnancies or the emotional toll of infertility. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate mental health support and resources within the framework of family planning services to provide holistic care that addresses both the physical and emotional well-being of individuals.

Relationship Dynamics and Communication between Partners: The dynamics of a relationship and the quality of communication between partners are significant factors influencing family planning decisions. An individual’s relationship status can impact their choices regarding contraception.¹² In many relationships, male partners exert a considerable influence on decisions about contraceptive use, highlighting the importance of engaging both partners in family planning discussions.¹² Research has consistently shown a positive association between open and honest communication between couples about family planning and the increased uptake and consistent use of contraception.²³ Conversely, a lack of effective communication can hinder couples from achieving their desired childbearing goals and may lead to misunderstandings and disagreements.³⁰ Promoting joint decision-making in all aspects of family planning has been found to be particularly beneficial, leading to greater satisfaction and more effective outcomes.³⁰ These findings emphasize that open and honest communication between partners is absolutely essential for successful family planning and for achieving desired reproductive outcomes that are mutually agreed upon and supported. When couples feel comfortable discussing their family planning goals, preferences, and concerns openly, they are far more likely to make informed decisions together and to use contraception consistently and effectively. Encouraging male involvement in family planning counseling sessions and actively fostering healthy communication patterns between partners are therefore critical components of comprehensive family planning services.

Personal Aspirations and Desire for Children: An individual’s personal aspirations, particularly their educational and career goals, often play a significant role in influencing the timing of their family planning decisions.⁴ The desire to establish a sense of financial stability before taking on the responsibilities of parenthood is also a key factor that many individuals and couples carefully consider.²² Personal choices to delay pregnancy in order to pursue educational or professional opportunities directly impact their need for and use of contraception.³² Ultimately, the fundamental desire for children, or the decision to not have children, is a core element that shapes all family planning decisions.⁴⁹ These observations underscore that an individual’s broader life goals and their personal desire for parenthood are significant factors that shape their decisions about when and whether to have children. People may choose to delay starting a family to prioritize their education or establish their careers, which necessitates the consistent and effective use of contraception to prevent unintended pregnancies during these periods of their lives. Therefore, understanding these personal aspirations and long-term goals is an important aspect of providing relevant and supportive family planning information and counseling.

8. Legal and Ethical Considerations in US Family Planning

Legal Framework Surrounding Reproductive Rights: The legal framework in the United States surrounding reproductive rights has significantly shaped access to family planning services. The landmark Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965 affirmed the constitutional right to contraception, establishing that states cannot legally prohibit its use.⁵⁰ Building upon this foundation, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) included a mandate requiring most health insurance plans to cover a wide range of preventive services, including contraception, without any cost-sharing for patients.⁹ However, the legal landscape experienced a significant shift in 2022 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned the nearly 50-year precedent set by Roe v. Wade, thereby eliminating the constitutional right to abortion and allowing individual states to regulate or ban the procedure.²⁰ As a result, the legal status of abortion now varies considerably from state to state.⁵¹ In response to ongoing debates and concerns about access to reproductive healthcare, the Right to Contraception Act was introduced in Congress with the aim of solidifying a national statutory right to access contraception and standardizing definitions related to birth control.⁵⁰ These legal developments at both the federal and state levels have a profound and direct impact on the availability and accessibility of both contraception and abortion services across the United States. The complex and constantly evolving legal landscape of reproductive rights in the US significantly influences individuals’ ability to access essential family planning services. Court decisions and legislative actions at both federal and state levels directly determine the extent to which individuals can access contraception and abortion, underscoring the critical importance of understanding these legal frameworks.

Ethical Considerations Related to Informed Consent and Confidentiality: Ethical considerations are paramount in the provision of family planning services, with informed consent and the protection of patient confidentiality being fundamental principles. The concept of informed choice is a cornerstone of ethical family planning counseling, ensuring that individuals have the autonomy to make decisions about their reproductive health based on complete and accurate information.⁸ Healthcare providers have an ethical obligation to provide patients with comprehensive and truthful information about their medical condition, available treatment options (including all contraceptive methods), and the potential benefits and risks associated with each choice.⁵⁵ Maintaining strict patient confidentiality is also absolutely crucial, particularly for adolescents and other vulnerable populations seeking family planning services.³⁴ Ethical dilemmas can arise, however, regarding the appropriate level of parental involvement in the reproductive health decisions of minors, requiring careful navigation to balance the rights and well-being of both the adolescent patient and their parents or guardians.⁵² The ethical principles of autonomy (respecting an individual’s right to self-determination), beneficence (acting in the patient’s best interest), non-maleficence (avoiding harm), and justice (ensuring fair and equitable access to care) must guide the provision of all family planning services. These principles ensure that individuals are empowered to make their own decisions about their reproductive health based on complete and accurate information, and that their privacy and autonomy are consistently respected, especially for vulnerable populations like adolescents who may face unique challenges in accessing care.

Ethical Concerns Regarding Potential Coercion and Discrimination: The history of family planning in the United States includes deeply concerning instances of nonconsensual sterilization and coercive programs, particularly targeting women from minority groups and those with low incomes or disabilities. These historical injustices raise significant ethical concerns that continue to resonate today.⁷ There are ongoing concerns about the potential for implicit biases among healthcare providers to influence their contraceptive recommendations, potentially leading to differential treatment based on a patient’s race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status.⁷ Ethical considerations also arise in the context of decisions regarding permanent contraception for minors, particularly those with intellectual developmental disorders, requiring careful consideration of their capacity for informed consent and the potential for coercion.⁶⁰ The history of coercive practices in family planning necessitates ongoing vigilance and critical self-reflection to ensure that current policies and clinical practices consistently uphold the principles of reproductive autonomy and actively avoid any form of discrimination or coercion. Past abuses of power in the name of family planning have created deep-seated mistrust, particularly within marginalized communities. It is therefore absolutely crucial to ensure that all individuals have access to family planning services that are entirely voluntary, non-coercive, and respectful of their individual rights and choices.

9. Disparities in Family Planning Decisions and Outcomes

Racial and Ethnic Disparities: Significant disparities persist in rates of unintended pregnancy, abortion, and unintended births across different racial and ethnic groups within the United States.⁷ Data consistently show that Black and Hispanic women experience higher rates of unintended pregnancy compared to their White counterparts.⁷ Furthermore, patterns of contraceptive use and the specific methods chosen also vary considerably by race and ethnicity.⁷ Alarmingly, women of color often face more significant barriers when attempting to access contraceptive care, including financial constraints, lack of transportation, and systemic biases within the healthcare system.²⁰ These persistent disparities underscore the fact that systemic inequities and the enduring legacy of historical injustices continue to contribute to significant racial and ethnic differences in family planning outcomes. Factors such as unequal access to quality healthcare services, culturally specific beliefs and practices related to reproduction, and historical mistrust of the medical system, particularly within minority communities, all contribute to these observed disparities. Addressing these complex underlying issues is therefore absolutely essential to achieve true reproductive equity for all individuals in the United States.

Socioeconomic Disparities (Revisited): As discussed in detail in Section 4, socioeconomic disparities have a profound impact on family planning decisions and outcomes. Individuals with lower income and education levels consistently experience higher rates of unintended pregnancy and tend to utilize less effective methods of contraception.⁷ Financial barriers also significantly impede access to both family planning services in general and abortion care specifically, creating a two-tiered system of reproductive healthcare based on socioeconomic status.⁷

Age-Related Disparities: Age is another critical factor influencing family planning decisions and their outcomes. Adolescents, in particular, face an especially high risk of experiencing unintended pregnancies.⁶ While overall teen pregnancy and birth rates have shown a decline in recent years, they remain a significant public health concern in the United States.⁶ Interestingly, trends in birth rates have also shifted across different age groups, with a notable decline among women under the age of 30 and a corresponding increase in birth rates among women aged 30 and older.⁶² These age-related trends highlight the fact that individuals at different stages of their lives face unique challenges and considerations when it comes to family planning. Adolescents, for example, may lack access to comprehensive sex education, face social stigma in seeking reproductive healthcare, and may have limited financial resources, all of which can contribute to their increased risk of unintended pregnancy. On the other hand, older women may encounter different fertility challenges and require tailored family planning support and counseling that addresses their specific needs and concerns.

Geographic Disparities: Where an individual lives in the United States can also significantly impact their access to family planning resources and subsequently influence their reproductive choices and outcomes. Individuals residing in rural areas often face greater challenges in accessing a full range of family planning services compared to those living in more urbanized areas.⁵ The existence of “contraceptive deserts,” defined as geographic areas with limited access to the full spectrum of FDA-approved contraceptive methods, further exacerbates these disparities.²⁰ These geographic limitations highlight the uneven distribution of healthcare resources and providers across the country, leading to significant disparities in access to essential family planning services for those living in remote or underserved communities.

10. Methodologies and Approaches to Family Planning Decision-Making

Models of Family Planning Counseling: Several established models provide a structured framework for healthcare providers to guide individuals through the family planning counseling process. The GATHER model, which includes steps to Greet the client, Ask about their situation and needs, Tell them about different methods and options, Help clients choose a method, Explain how to use the chosen method, and schedule a Return visit, offers a comprehensive approach.³⁹ Another widely used model is the REDI model, which focuses on Rapport-building, Exploration of the client’s needs and circumstances, Decision-making regarding the appropriate method, and Implementation of that decision.³⁹ Utilizing these established counseling models ensures that healthcare providers adopt a systematic and client-centered approach to family planning discussions, covering all essential aspects of informed decision-making. These models provide a valuable roadmap for healthcare providers, enabling them to effectively guide individuals through the often complex process of making well-informed choices about their reproductive health and family planning goals.

Importance of Patient-Centered Care: Patient-centered care is a critical element of high-quality family planning services. Contraceptive counseling should be patient-centered, meaning it prioritizes the individual’s unique needs, values, and preferences, and should also be trauma-informed, recognizing the potential impact of past experiences on current healthcare decisions.⁵ A patient-centered approach focuses on thoroughly understanding the woman’s fertility goals, her specific contraceptive needs, and her personal preferences regarding different methods.³⁷ It emphasizes the importance of respecting the individual’s autonomy in making decisions about their reproductive health and creating a safe and supportive space for open and honest dialogue between the patient and the provider.³⁷ The Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) Measure has been developed to assess the quality of counseling by evaluating key domains such as interpersonal connection between the provider and the patient, the provision of adequate and understandable information about contraceptive options, and the level of decision support offered to the patient.⁹ Adopting a patient-centered approach empowers individuals to make family planning choices that truly align with their personal values, their unique circumstances, and their long-term reproductive goals, ultimately leading to greater satisfaction with their care and better health outcomes. When healthcare providers prioritize the patient’s perspective, actively listen to their concerns, and involve them as active participants in the decision-making process, individuals are more likely to choose and consistently adhere to a contraceptive method that effectively meets their needs and preferences.

Shared Decision-Making: Shared decision-making is a collaborative approach where the healthcare provider and the patient jointly discuss and determine the most suitable contraceptive method or family planning strategy.³⁷ This model recognizes the client as the primary decision-maker regarding their reproductive health and positions the provider in a supportive role, offering expertise and guidance while respecting the patient’s autonomy.⁴⁸ Shared decision-making involves a reciprocal exchange of information, where the provider elicits the patient’s preferences, values, and concerns, and in turn, provides comprehensive and unbiased information about the available options, including their effectiveness, risks, and benefits.³⁷ This collaborative process ensures that the final decision reflects the patient’s informed choice and is aligned with their individual circumstances and reproductive goals. By fostering a partnership between the provider and the patient, shared decision-making promotes a sense of ownership and empowerment in family planning choices, leading to greater adherence and satisfaction.

Couple Communication and Male Involvement: Recognizing that family planning often involves both partners, encouraging open and honest communication between couples is a crucial aspect of effective family planning services. Research has consistently demonstrated that when couples discuss their fertility intentions and engage in joint decision-making about whether and when to have children, it leads to increased uptake and consistent use of modern contraception.²³ Inviting and encouraging male partners to actively participate in family planning counseling sessions has also been shown to be highly beneficial.³⁰ Couple counseling specifically focused on contraception can significantly increase male partners’ understanding of different methods, their effectiveness, and their impact on the overall health and financial security of the family, thereby fostering greater acceptance and support for family planning.³⁰ Promoting healthy and open communication between couples about their reproductive goals and preferences can significantly increase the adoption of modern contraception and help couples achieve their desired family size and timing.³⁰ Involving male partners in family planning discussions and decisions not only supports women’s reproductive autonomy but also fosters a shared responsibility for family well-being, leading to improved reproductive health outcomes for both individuals.

Fertility Awareness-Based Methods (FABM) and Natural Family Planning (NFP): Fertility awareness-based methods (FABM) and natural family planning (NFP) are approaches to family planning that involve understanding and tracking a woman’s natural monthly fertility pattern to either plan or avoid pregnancy.¹³ These methods rely on the observation of various biologic markers that indicate the fertile days within a woman’s reproductive cycle.⁶⁴ By identifying these fertile periods, couples can then either abstain from intercourse or use a barrier method of contraception during those days to avoid pregnancy. Different types of FABM and NFP exist, including calendar calculation methods (like the rhythm method), basal body temperature charting, cervical mucus monitoring (like the Billings Ovulation Method and the Creighton Model), the symptothermal method (which combines multiple markers), and the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) which utilizes breastfeeding as a temporary form of contraception under specific conditions.⁶⁴ The effectiveness of FABM and NFP in preventing pregnancy can vary significantly depending on whether the methods are used perfectly and consistently or with typical use, which may include inconsistencies or errors in application.⁸ FABM and NFP offer viable options for individuals and couples who prefer non-hormonal methods of contraception or who wish to plan pregnancies naturally without the use of medical interventions. However, it is crucial to provide thorough and accurate education on the correct and consistent use of these methods, as well as to discuss their effectiveness rates in comparison to other available contraceptive options, to ensure that individuals can make informed choices that align with their risk tolerance and reproductive goals.

11. Challenges and Barriers to Effective Family Planning

Financial Barriers (Revisited): Despite efforts to improve access, the cost of contraception and family planning services remains a significant obstacle for many individuals in the United States.⁶ The lack of comprehensive insurance coverage for all types of contraception further exacerbates these financial challenges, particularly for those with low incomes or inadequate health insurance plans.⁶

Access Barriers (Revisited): Geographic limitations continue to pose substantial barriers to accessing family planning services, especially for individuals living in rural areas or designated contraceptive deserts.²⁰ Lack of reliable transportation options and inconvenient clinic locations or operating hours also contribute to these access challenges.⁶

Informational Barriers: Many individuals still lack adequate knowledge about the full range of contraceptive methods available, their correct usage, and their potential benefits and risks.⁷ Misconceptions and myths surrounding contraception and its potential side effects persist and can deter individuals from using effective methods.⁷ Furthermore, some individuals report receiving insufficient or even inaccurate guidance from healthcare workers regarding their family planning options.¹¹

Social and Cultural Barriers (Revisited): Social stigma associated with family planning and contraception use can prevent individuals from seeking necessary services or openly discussing their reproductive health.³³ Unsupportive partners or familial pressure against contraception can also create significant barriers, particularly for women.¹² Deeply ingrained traditional beliefs and attitudes about ideal family size and gender roles within families and communities can also influence family planning decisions.²² In some cases, religious opposition to certain methods of contraception can also limit individuals’ choices and access to care.⁷

Healthcare System Barriers: Negative attitudes or biases exhibited by some healthcare workers towards certain patient populations or contraceptive choices can create barriers to care.¹¹ Inaccurate or incomplete knowledge about contraception among some healthcare providers can also lead to suboptimal counseling and recommendations.³⁶ Furthermore, various harmful regulations and policies at the state and federal levels can restrict access to essential family planning services, including limitations on abortion referrals and funding for certain organizations.²⁰ The exclusion of certain qualified providers, such as those offering abortion services, from participating in Medicaid programs further limits access for low-income individuals.²¹ Restrictions on the type of pregnancy options counseling that providers can offer can also hinder informed decision-making.³⁸ Finally, the conflation of contraception with abortion or “abortifacients” in some policies and public discourse can lead to unwarranted restrictions on access to certain highly effective contraceptive methods.⁵⁰

12. Conclusion and Recommendations

Family planning decisions in the United States are influenced by a complex and interconnected web of factors spanning individual knowledge and beliefs, socioeconomic circumstances, cultural and social norms, healthcare access and quality, psychological and relational dynamics, and the legal and ethical landscape. This analysis has revealed persistent disparities in access to and outcomes of family planning across racial and ethnic groups, socioeconomic strata, age cohorts, and geographic locations. Addressing the multifaceted challenges and barriers that hinder effective family planning for many individuals requires a comprehensive and multi-layered approach.

Recommendations:

Policymakers:

• Significantly increase public funding for comprehensive family planning programs at both the federal and state levels, including robust support for Title X and Medicaid, to expand access to affordable care for all individuals.²¹
• Enact and enforce policies that ensure universal coverage for the full range of FDA-approved contraceptive methods without any cost-sharing for patients, recognizing the importance of contraception as essential preventive healthcare.⁷
• Actively protect and expand access to abortion services, recognizing abortion as a critical component of comprehensive reproductive healthcare.²⁰
• Codify the right to contraception into federal law to safeguard access for all individuals, regardless of their location or other circumstances.⁵⁰
• Address discriminatory policies and acknowledge the historical injustices that have created deep-seated mistrust of the healthcare system, particularly within minority communities, and work towards building trust and ensuring equitable access to care.⁷
• Support and mandate comprehensive and evidence-based sex education in schools, beginning at an age-appropriate level, to equip young people with the knowledge and skills necessary to make informed decisions about their sexual and reproductive health.³
• Implement policies aimed at reducing socioeconomic barriers to healthcare access, such as expanding Medicaid eligibility criteria, increasing the availability of affordable health insurance options, and providing transportation assistance to healthcare facilities for those in need.⁷

Healthcare Providers:

• Commit to providing patient-centered, culturally sensitive, and trauma-informed contraceptive counseling that respects individual values and preferences and empowers informed decision-making.⁵
• Ensure that patients have access to the full range of contraceptive methods available and receive accurate, unbiased, and comprehensive information about their effectiveness, potential benefits, and associated risks.²
• Proactively address common misconceptions and myths surrounding contraception and its potential side effects by providing clear and evidence-based information.⁷
• Actively promote and facilitate shared decision-making between providers and patients, ensuring that family planning choices are made collaboratively and reflect the individual’s informed preferences and reproductive goals.³⁷
• Encourage the involvement of male partners in family planning discussions and provide resources and counseling that facilitate open and honest communication between couples about their reproductive goals.³⁰
• Participate in ongoing training and professional development to address any implicit biases and ensure the provision of equitable and high-quality care to all patients, regardless of their race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or other background characteristics.⁷

Community Organizations:

• Develop and disseminate culturally appropriate and linguistically accessible family planning information and resources that address the specific needs and beliefs of diverse communities.⁷
• Actively work to address social stigma surrounding family planning and contraception use within communities by promoting open and honest conversations and challenging misinformation.³³
• Establish strong partnerships with local healthcare providers and clinics to increase access to family planning services in underserved areas and to facilitate referrals and follow-up care.²¹
• Offer comprehensive support and resources for individuals and couples as they navigate the often-complex process of making family planning decisions, including addressing financial concerns, transportation needs, and childcare challenges.

Continued research and rigorous evaluation are essential to monitor trends in family planning decisions and outcomes, identify emerging challenges, and assess the effectiveness of various interventions and policies aimed at improving access and equity. By implementing these comprehensive recommendations, the United States can move towards a future where all individuals have the resources and support they need to make informed decisions about their reproductive health and achieve their family planning goals.

Works cited

1. Family planning – Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_planning
2. Overview of Family Planning in the United States – NCBI, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215219/
3. Reproductive Health Services and Resources | HHS Office of …, accessed May 8, 2025, https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/adolescent-sexual-and-reproductive-health/reproductive-health-services-and
4. The Social and Economic Benefits of Women’s Ability to Determine Whether and When to Have Children – Guttmacher Institute, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/social-economic-benefits.pdf
5. Advancing Contraceptive Care to Improve Maternal Health … – ASTHO, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.astho.org/topic/toolkit/advancing-contraceptive-care-to-improve-maternal-health-outcomes/
6. Family Planning Workgroup – Healthy People 2030 | odphp.health.gov, accessed May 8, 2025, https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/about/workgroups/family-planning-workgroup
7. Disparities in Family Planning – PMC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2835625/
8. Family planning/contraception methods – World Health Organization (WHO), accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception
9. The Link: Family Planning and Maternal Mental Health, accessed May 8, 2025, https://policycentermmh.org/the-link-family-planning-and-maternal-mental-health/
10. Social Factors Influencing Family Planning Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Ngäbe Population in Bocas del Toro and – Digital Commons @ UConn – University of Connecticut, accessed May 8, 2025, https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2614&context=gs_theses
11. Full article: Exploring the multilevel factors influencing women’s choices and utilisation of family planning services in Mufulira district, Zambia: A socio-ecological perspective – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/27707571.2023.2168589
12. Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13625187.2022.2096215
13. Contraception and Birth Control Methods – CDC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/contraception/about/index.html
14. (PDF) Impact of Reproductive Health Education on Contraceptive …, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386080296_Impact_of_Reproductive_Health_Education_on_Contraceptive_Use_and_Family_Planning
15. Impact of Contraceptive Education on Contraceptive Knowledge and Decision Making: A Systematic Review – PMC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4532374/
16. What Is Your Ideal Family Size? Personal Preference! – Stone Oak Counselors, accessed May 8, 2025, https://stoneoakcounselors.com/what-is-your-ideal-family-size/
17. To use or not to use: Exploring factors influencing the uptake of modern contraceptives in urban informal settlements of Mumbai | PLOS Global Public Health, accessed May 8, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000634
18. Impact of Social Determinants of Health on the Choice and Use of Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives – Scientific Research Publishing, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=100975
19. Receipt of Family Planning Services in the United States … – CDC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db520.htm
20. Ensuring Contraception Options Are Accessible and Affordable …, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/playbook-for-the-advancement-of-women-in-the-economy/ensuring-contraception-options-are-accessible-and-affordable/
21. Fact Sheet: Challenges and Solutions to Improve Access to Contraception Through Section 1115 Medicaid Waivers and SPAs – Center for American Progress, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/fact-sheet-challenges-and-solutions-to-improve-access-to-contraception-through-section-1115-medicaid-waivers-and-spas/
22. 5 Key Factors Affecting Family Planning Decisions – Androcare …, accessed May 8, 2025, https://androcarefertilityng.org/5-key-factors-affecting-family-planning-decisions/
23. Social Norms: Promoting community support for family planning – HIPs, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/social-norms/
24. Socioeconomic and Cultural Influences on Contraceptive Use – The Best Intentions – NCBI, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232120/
25. Family planning: cultural and religious perspectives – PubMed, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8345093/
26. Knowledge of Contraceptive Usage and Cultural Influence on Adoption of Family Planning Information in Cross River State | SciTechnol, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.scitechnol.com/peer-review/knowledge-of-contraceptive-usage-and-cultural-influence-on-adoption-of-family-planning-information-in-cross-river-state-bdaX.php?article_id=21241
27. A Cross-Cultural Exploration: Global Methods of Contraception and Family Planning – Virtual Commons – Bridgewater State University, accessed May 8, 2025, https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1629&context=honors_proj
28. A Cross-Cultural Exploration: Global Methods of Contraception and Family Planning – Virtual Commons – Bridgewater State University, accessed May 8, 2025, https://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1547&context=undergrad_rev
29. Factors that influence married/partnered women’s decisions to use contraception in Zambia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/global-womens-health/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2023.1157097/full
30. Promoting healthy couples’ communication to improve reproductive health outcomes – HIPs, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.fphighimpactpractices.org/briefs/couple-communication/
31. Patterns of family-planning decision making among couples: Most… – ResearchGate, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Patterns-of-family-planning-decision-making-among-couples-Most-frequently-expressed_tbl2_224869492
32. Using the Social-Ecological Model to Understand the Current Perspective of Contraceptive Use in the United States: A Narrative Literature Review – MDPI, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4184/1/4/19
33. 5 Upsetting Reasons Women Aren’t Using Family Planning Around the World Today, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.usaforunfpa.org/5-upsetting-reasons-women-arent-using-family-planning-around-the-world-today/
34. Challenges Facing Family Planning Clinics And Title X | Guttmacher Institute, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2001/04/challenges-facing-family-planning-clinics-and-title-x
35. Reproductive Health Impact Study | Guttmacher Institute, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/reproductive-health-impact-study
36. NIH Public Access – Every Body Texas, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.everybodytexas.org/uploads/files/general/2014-12_NIH_Dehlendorf_ContraceptionCounselingBestPractices.pdf
37. Patient-centered approaches for family planning counseling and support: A systematic review | medRxiv, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.22.23291755v1.full-text
38. Full article: The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26410397.2022.2089322
39. FAMILY PLANNING COUNSELLING – Counselling for Maternal and Newborn Health Care – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304183/
40. Publicly Supported Family Planning Services in the United States – Guttmacher Institute, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/publicly-supported-FP-services-US
41. Expanding Contraceptive Method Choice for Successful Family Planning Programs – PACE, accessed May 8, 2025, https://thepaceproject.org/method-choice/
42. Family Planning – Healthy People 2030 | odphp.health.gov, accessed May 8, 2025, https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/family-planning
43. Psychological Aspects of Contraception, Unintended Pregnancy …, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4416399/
44. Psychosocial Consequences to Women of Contraceptive Use and Controlled Fertility – NCBI, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235086/
45. National Public Health Action Plan for the Detection, Prevention, and Management of Infertility – CDC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/media/pdfs/infertility/DRH-NAP-Final-508.pdf
46. Time for Public Health Action on Infertility | Public Health Grand Rounds – CDC Archive, accessed May 8, 2025, https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/grand-rounds/pp/2014/20140819-infertility-pregnancy.html
47. Women decision making on use of modern family planning methods and associated factors, evidence from PMA Ethiopia – PLOS, accessed May 8, 2025, https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298516
48. User-Centered Counseling in Contraceptive Decision-Making: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Urban Malawi∗ – Boston University, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.bu.edu/econ/files/2022/05/376.pdf
49. Full article: Research on family planning issues in women with mental disorders, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638230600801488
50. Understanding The Contraception Regulation Debate: Legal, Moral And Regulatory Implications | ACE – Alliance for Citizen Engagement, accessed May 8, 2025, https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-publichealth/understanding-the-contraception-regulation-debate-legal-moral-and-regulatory-implications/
51. The Right to Contraception: State and Federal Actions, Misinformation, and the Courts | KFF, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/the-right-to-contraception-state-and-federal-actions-misinformation-and-the-courts/
52. Ethical Issues in Family Planning | Journal of Ethics | American …, accessed May 8, 2025, https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/issue/ethical-issues-family-planning
53. Ethical Questions About Birth Control | American Pregnancy Association, accessed May 8, 2025, https://americanpregnancy.org/unplanned-pregnancy/birth-control-pills-patches-and-devices/ethical-questions-about-birth-control/
54. Informed Choice and Decision-Making in Family Planning Counseling in Kenya, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/ipsrh/1998/03/informed-choice-and-decision-making-family-planning-counseling-kenya
55. Ethical Dilemmas in Family Planning – The Climate Change and Public Health Law Site, accessed May 8, 2025, https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/map/EthicalDilemmasinFamilyPlanning.html
56. Legal and Ethical Issues in the Provision of Adolescent Reproductive Health in the United States – The Aquila Digital Community, accessed May 8, 2025, https://aquila.usm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1190&context=ojhe
57. Ethical issues in family planning for hospitalized psychiatric patients – Psychiatry Online, accessed May 8, 2025, https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/ajp.132.3.236
58. Ethical Issues in Providing and Promoting Contraception to Women with Opioid Use Disorder – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9444340/
59. Factors Influencing Family Planning Uptake Among Adolescents and Postpartum Women in Kenya – ScholarWorks | Walden University Research, accessed May 8, 2025, https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11031&context=dissertations
60. Examining Permanent Contraception for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Intellectual Developmental Disorder: Ethical, Legal, and Medical Considerations: Clinical Report | Pediatrics – AAP Publications, accessed May 8, 2025, https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/154/5/e2024068955/199650/Examining-Permanent-Contraception-for-Children
61. Family Planning, Natural Family Planning, and Abortion Use among U. S. Hispanic Women – e-Publications@Marquette, accessed May 8, 2025, https://epublications.marquette.edu/context/nursing_fac/article/1306/viewcontent/fehring_5600.pdf
62. National Vital Statistics Reports – CDC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr74/nvsr74-3.pdf
63. Births – Health, United States – CDC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/topics/births.htm
64. Natural Family Planning – AAFP, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2012/1115/p924.html
65. Cultural Barriers to Family Planning – Girls’ Globe, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.girlsglobe.org/2013/11/14/cultural-barriers-to-family-planning/
66. The complex factors involved in family fertility decisions – World Bank Blogs, accessed May 8, 2025, https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/health/complex-factors-involved-family-fertility-decisions
67. May 2, 2025 The Honorable Susan Collins Chair Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Chair – The White House, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Fiscal-Year-2026-Discretionary-Budget-Request.pdf
68. The U.S. Government and International Family Planning & Reproductive Health Efforts – KFF, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.kff.org/global-health-policy/fact-sheet/the-u-s-government-and-international-family-planning-reproductive-health-efforts/