Decision Making for Ethical and Moral Frameworks: The Influence of Core Values, Political Beliefs, and Guiding Principles

Ethical and moral frameworks serve as essential structures for navigating the complexities of decision making in both individual and organizational spheres.¹ These frameworks provide a systematic approach to choices that carry moral implications, ensuring that actions are informed by principles and values rather than mere impulse.³ An ethical framework can be understood as a heuristic tool or a perspective utilized to reason through what course of action might yield the most moral outcome.¹ These frameworks manifest in various forms, such as decision-making models, established codes of conduct, sets of guiding principles, and comprehensive training programs.¹ While ethics is often viewed through an abstract lens, the application of ethical frameworks bridges the gap between theory and practice, offering a structured, reflective, transparent, and logical foundation for navigating morally significant decisions in everyday life.²

At the heart of these frameworks lie moral frameworks, which encompass the fundamental principles and values that shape an individual’s or group’s sense of right and wrong.³ Decision making, within this context, is the process of selecting a course of action when confronted with choices that have ethical or moral weight, necessitating a careful evaluation of potential consequences and alignment with underlying principles.⁵ Several key elements intricately influence the development and application of these frameworks. Core values, representing the most deeply held beliefs and ideals, act as foundational principles that guide behavior and shape decisions.⁸ Political beliefs, a person’s attitudes and ideologies regarding governance and societal organization, can also significantly impact their moral and ethical perspectives.¹⁰ Finally, guiding principles, derived from ethical theories, core values, or practical experience, serve as practical tools that offer direction and a basis for making specific choices within an ethical framework.¹ These elements are interconnected, with core values and political beliefs often informing the guiding principles that constitute an ethical framework, which subsequently influences the decision-making process in situations with moral relevance.

Core values play a fundamental role in establishing and shaping ethical frameworks. These intrinsic beliefs, which are not merely abstract ideals, act as powerful motivators that prioritize actions and guide decisions, functioning as an inner compass that provides clarity and direction when navigating life’s uncertainties.⁹ Personal core values are shaped by a multitude of factors, including cultural and religious traditions, an individual’s personal history, their life experiences, and their expectations.⁹ These values are subjective and can differ considerably from person to person.¹⁴ Conflicts arising from these diverse core values can often lead to the emergence of ethical dilemmas, highlighting the deeply personal nature of morality.¹⁴ In contrast, societal core values represent the shared beliefs held by various collectives, such as groups, families, associations, societies, and even entire nations.¹⁴ These shared values provide the essential foundation upon which these groups are formed and function, acting as a unifying force often referred to as “social capital”.¹⁴ Ethical standards, commonly known as mores, frequently reflect what the majority within a society accepts as being good and right, influencing behavior even in the absence of formal rules.¹⁵ Furthermore, professional core values are those shared within specific organizations, corporations, and professions, contributing to the definition of their respective fields of activity and organizational cultures.¹⁴ For instance, the value of care is paramount in the medical profession, while justice and due process are pre-eminent in the field of law.¹⁴

Core values provide the fundamental basis for the development of ethical principles, acting as the bedrock upon which moral decision-making is built.¹⁶ These values help individuals prioritize their actions, offer ethical guidance in situations where the correct course is not immediately obvious, and foster a sense of consistency in their decision-making processes.⁹ In the context of ethical decision making, core values serve as a filter, aiding in the clarification of potential gains and losses for all stakeholders involved and thereby enhancing ethical awareness among decision makers.¹⁷ Josephson’s Core Values Model exemplifies this, providing a structured approach that utilizes core values such as trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, and citizenship to analyze ethical dilemmas by carefully considering the impact on various stakeholders and determining which decision aligns most closely with these fundamental values.¹⁷

The relationship between core values and different ethical approaches is also significant. Utilitarianism, for example, is underpinned by core values that emphasize the maximization of overall well-being and the principle of impartiality, aiming to achieve the greatest good for the largest number of people.¹⁸ Deontology, on the other hand, aligns with core values such as duty, a profound respect for individual autonomy, and the recognition of inherent rights, placing a strong emphasis on moral rules and obligations.²¹ Virtue ethics centers on core values like honesty, courage, compassion, and integrity, focusing on the development of moral character as the primary driver of ethical behavior.²³ Furthermore, rights-based ethics is directly connected to core values that champion human dignity and fundamental freedoms ³, while care-based ethics prioritizes core values such as empathy, the nurturing of relationships, and the overall well-being of individuals and their interconnectedness.³

Political beliefs exert a considerable influence on an individual’s moral and ethical perspectives, often shaping the very foundations upon which they base their judgments of right and wrong.¹⁰ Research indicates that individuals with differing political ideologies tend to prioritize different moral foundations. For instance, those identifying as liberals often place a greater emphasis on the moral foundations of care and fairness, whereas conservatives tend to give more weight to values such as in-group loyalty, respect for authority, and the concept of purity.¹⁰ This suggests that a person’s political orientation can significantly impact which moral principles they consider most relevant when faced with a decision.¹⁰ Furthermore, political beliefs can influence the perceived moral intensity of an issue, subsequently affecting the ethical decision-making process.²⁷ Individuals holding different political leanings may, therefore, evaluate the same ethical dilemma through distinct lenses, potentially leading to divergent conclusions about the most appropriate course of action.

Political ethics, as a field, is concerned with making moral judgments about political actions and the policies enacted by governments.²⁸ Dominant political ideologies within a society often shape the laws and regulations that are created and enforced, thereby influencing societal norms regarding what is considered morally acceptable or unacceptable.²⁹ Moreover, the ideological leanings of judges can play a role in their legal interpretations and rulings, particularly in cases that are politically charged.³⁰ Interestingly, political affiliation can even shape an individual’s morals, potentially leading to the rationalization of behaviors or actions within their own political party that might otherwise be seen as conflicting with their personal moral compass.³¹ This suggests a potential for bias in ethical judgment based on an individual’s alignment with a particular political group. The phenomenon of moral polarization, characterized by a tendency to view those in opposing political parties negatively in terms of their moral character, is closely connected to political affiliations.³² The use of moral rhetoric in political advocacy can further contribute to this polarization, leading to a divergence in attitudes and a heightened sense of division within society.³³ Notably, political polarization can sometimes result in individuals being more willing to set aside or bend their personal morals when operating within the political sphere, often driven by a sense of hostility towards the opposing political side.³⁴ This indicates a potentially concerning disconnect between an individual’s personal ethics and their behavior or tolerance of behavior within a political context. Integrating political beliefs into one’s personal ethics is a complex process, often requiring individuals to navigate the tensions that can arise between their own values and the broader political and social landscape.³⁵

Guiding principles serve as practical tools within ethical frameworks, offering concrete direction for navigating moral dilemmas. These principles are often derived from various ethical theories, providing different lenses through which to evaluate potential courses of action.³⁶ The Greatest Happiness Principle, originating from utilitarianism, posits that actions are morally right to the extent that they promote happiness and morally wrong to the extent that they produce unhappiness for the greatest number of people.³⁷ Here, utility is often understood in terms of overall well-being or related concepts.¹⁹ In contrast, the Categorical Imperative, a cornerstone of deontology, dictates that one should act only according to principles that they could rationally will to become universal laws, treating all individuals as ends in themselves and never merely as means to an end.⁴⁰ Virtue ethics emphasizes the importance of developing moral character, with right actions being those that a virtuous person, possessing traits like courage, honesty, and compassion, would characteristically perform.⁴³ Practical wisdom, or phronesis, plays a crucial role in virtue ethics, enabling individuals to discern the appropriate course of action in specific situations.⁴³

These guiding principles offer practical assistance in resolving ethical dilemmas by providing different criteria for evaluating options and potential consequences.³⁶ They aid in considering the overall welfare of the majority, respecting fundamental moral duties and rights, and focusing on the character and intentions of the actors involved.³⁶ However, the application of these ethical principles often requires careful consideration of the specific context of a situation and may involve navigating and balancing competing values.⁶ No single principle can be universally applied without thoughtful judgment and an understanding of the nuances inherent in each unique ethical challenge.⁶ While utilitarianism’s strength lies in its focus on maximizing overall welfare, it can face limitations in defining and measuring happiness, potentially overlooking issues of fairness and equity, and even risking the justification of violating individual rights for the greater good.³⁶ Deontology provides strong principles for upholding human rights and dignity but can sometimes be inflexible and may present challenges when different moral rules come into conflict.³⁶ Virtue ethics offers a nuanced perspective by emphasizing moral character but may be criticized for lacking clear-cut guidelines for action and for its potential subjectivity.³⁶

The interplay between personal values, societal norms, and ethical decision making is a complex and dynamic process. Ethical decision making often involves selecting actions that not only align with an individual’s core values but also take into account the broader societal standards and expectations.⁵ Societal norms, which reflect what the majority within a community or culture accept as good and right, significantly influence individual behavior, often without the need for formal rules or regulations.¹⁵ While personal values and societal norms frequently overlap and reinforce one another, instances of conflict can arise when an individual’s deeply held beliefs diverge from the prevailing norms of their society.⁵ In such situations, individuals may experience societal pressure to conform, which can sometimes compromise their ability to act in accordance with their own ethical principles.⁵ Decisions in morally ambiguous situations often require a careful negotiation between an individual’s personal values and the established moral frameworks of their community.⁴⁸

The concept of ethical relativism suggests that morality is not based on universal truths but is instead relative to the specific norms and beliefs of a particular culture, implying that there are no absolute standards of right and wrong that apply to all people at all times.⁴⁹ Culture provides a comprehensive framework of values, norms, and beliefs that guide both individual behavior and the broader ethical decision-making processes within a society.⁵⁰ Because cultural norms can vary significantly between different societies, what is considered ethical in one culture may be deemed unethical in another.⁵¹ While ethical relativism highlights the diversity of moral perspectives across cultures, many ethicists argue against the notion that there are no universal moral standards that transcend cultural boundaries.⁴⁹ Furthermore, moral choices are not made in a vacuum; the social context in which a decision is made can significantly impact the values and principles that are selectively activated.⁵² Individuals may adjust their moral judgments based on social expectations and a desire to present themselves in a manner that is considered acceptable within their current social environment.⁵³

Developing a personal ethical framework is a crucial step towards navigating the complexities of moral decision making with clarity and integrity. This process involves a deliberate effort to clarify one’s own values, principles, and priorities through careful reflection.⁵ It is about defining the core beliefs that will guide all of life’s decisions and establishing a personal vision for the kind of life one aspires to lead.⁵⁴ Identifying and defining personal core values is fundamental to this process, requiring introspection on deeply held beliefs and what truly matters to the individual.⁹ This reflection should take into account various influences, such as one’s upbringing, cultural background, and significant life experiences.⁵⁵ It is important to recognize that personal core values are subjective and can evolve as an individual gains new experiences and perspectives.¹⁴ Integrating established ethical theories and principles into a personal framework can provide a robust foundation for moral reasoning. This involves becoming familiar with different ethical approaches, such as utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics, and considering them as valuable tools for analyzing moral dilemmas.³ Incorporating key ethical principles, such as autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence, can further strengthen one’s personal ethical framework.⁵⁸ Throughout this process, self-awareness and regular reflection are paramount for ethical development, allowing individuals to understand how their own values, beliefs, and experiences shape their ethical decision making.⁵ Consistent self-reflection enables individuals to assess whether their actions align with their core values and provides opportunities for growth and refinement of their ethical compass.⁹

Examining case studies and real-world examples can provide valuable insights into the practical application of ethical frameworks and the influence of core values and political beliefs on decision making. For instance, the allocation of scarce healthcare resources often involves utilitarian principles, aiming to maximize benefit for the greatest number.⁶⁰ The classic trolley problem presents a scenario that highlights the tension between utilitarian and deontological approaches, forcing a consideration of consequences versus duties.³⁷ Corporate whistleblowing cases often exemplify virtue ethics, where individuals choose to act according to their conscience and values despite potential personal risks.⁶¹ Scandals such as the Takata airbag crisis demonstrate the failure to adhere to deontological principles, where the duty to protect consumers was seemingly disregarded.⁶² End-of-life care decisions in healthcare settings frequently involve complex ethical considerations, balancing patient autonomy with beneficence and non-maleficence.⁶³ The support for political leaders despite personal moral failings illustrates the powerful influence of political beliefs and partisan loyalty on ethical judgment.³⁵ Conversely, successful examples like IKEA’s efforts to combat child labor demonstrate a commitment to core values and ethical sourcing ⁶⁴, while failures like the Wells Fargo scandal underscore the detrimental consequences of neglecting ethical responsibility.⁶⁵

In conclusion, the decision-making process within ethical and moral frameworks is a multifaceted endeavor deeply influenced by the interplay of core values, political beliefs, and guiding principles. Core values provide the foundational moral compass, shaping the fundamental principles that guide our choices. Political beliefs can significantly color our ethical perspectives, influencing which moral considerations we prioritize and how we interpret ethical dilemmas. Guiding principles, derived from various ethical theories, offer practical tools for navigating complex moral landscapes, though their application often requires careful contextual understanding and a balancing of competing values. Ultimately, a holistic approach to ethical and moral decision making necessitates a nuanced understanding of these interconnected elements, alongside a strong sense of self-awareness and a commitment to ongoing ethical reflection and development. Navigating the complexities of ethical and moral choices in an ever-evolving world requires individuals and organizations to cultivate a robust ethical framework, grounded in deeply held values, informed by critical thinking, and guided by sound ethical principles.

Works cited

1. Ethical framework | Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/explore-engage/key-terms/ethical-framework#:~:text=An%20ethical%20framework%20is%20a,%2C%20training%20programs%2C%20and%20more.
2. Ethical framework | Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/explore-engage/key-terms/ethical-framework
3. What are ethical frameworks? — Center for Professional Personnel Development, accessed May 8, 2025, https://aese.psu.edu/teachag/curriculum/modules/bioethics-1/what-are-ethical-frameworks
4. What Are The 4 Ethical Frameworks And What Do They Mean? – EthixMerch, accessed May 8, 2025, https://ethixmerch.com/blog/what-ethical-frameworks-mean/
5. Doing the Right Thing: Ethical Decision-Making – Culture Partners, accessed May 8, 2025, https://culturepartners.com/insights/doing-the-right-thing-ethical-decision-making/
6. What is an ethical decision-making framework? — Center for Professional Personnel Development, accessed May 8, 2025, https://aese.psu.edu/teachag/curriculum/modules/bioethics-1/what-is-an-ethical-decision-making-framework
7. A Framework for Making Ethical Decisions | Science, Technology and Society, accessed May 8, 2025, https://sts.brown.edu/events/events-archive/making-choices/framework-making-ethical-decisions
8. Ethics Awareness – UCSD Blink, accessed May 8, 2025, https://blink.ucsd.edu/finance/accountability/ethics-awareness.html
9. The role of guiding personal values in making decisions and fostering authenticity, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.mind24-7.com/blog/the-role-of-guiding-personal-values-in-making-decisions-and-fostering-authenticity/
10. Shifting Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Using Moral Foundations Theory – PMC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4858184/
11. The Impact of Political Beliefs on Ethical Framework in Adults – Knowledge Exchange, accessed May 8, 2025, https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1095&context=jiur
12. A Framework for Ethical Decision Making – Santa Clara University, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/
13. Core Values: How to Lead Ethically and Why It Matters, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/exec-ed/difference/core-values-how-lead-ethically-why-it-matters
14. The Role of Values – andrew.cmu.ed, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/course/80-241/guided_inquiries/vcr_html/2100.html
15. Value and culture in ethical decision making – NACADA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Clearinghouse/View-Articles/Values-and-culture-in-ethical-decision-making.aspx
16. Foundational Ethics: 5 Core Principles for Ethical Decision-Making in 2024 – Infonetica, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.infonetica.net/articles/foundational-ethics
17. An Ethical Decision Model, accessed May 8, 2025, https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_law-for-entrepreneurs/s05-03-an-ethical-decision-model.html
18. utilitarianism.net, accessed May 8, 2025, https://utilitarianism.net/types-of-utilitarianism/#:~:text=As%20explained%20in%20Chapter%201,welfarism%2C%20impartiality%2C%20and%20aggregationism.
19. Utilitarianism – Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism
20. The History of Utilitarianism – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 8, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/
21. Deontology – Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontology
22. Deontological Ethics – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 8, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/
23. Virtues and Values Enhance Ethical Behavior – Ethics Sage, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ethicssage.com/2022/06/virtues-and-values-enhance-ethical-behavior.html
24. Virtue Ethics – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed May 8, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/
25. Ethical Decision-Making Frameworks For Leaders – Aurora Training Advantage, accessed May 8, 2025, https://auroratrainingadvantage.com/leadership/ethical-decision-making-frameworks/
26. Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations, accessed May 8, 2025, https://fbaum.unc.edu/teaching/articles/JPSP-2009-Moral-Foundations.pdf
27. 3 Frameworks for Ethical Decision Making – Florida Tech Online, accessed May 8, 2025, https://online.fit.edu/degrees/graduate/business/master-organizational-leadership/3-frameworks-for-ethical-decision-making/
28. Political ethics – Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_ethics
29. Ethics – Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics
30. The Influence of Political Ideology on Legal Decision-Making, accessed May 8, 2025, http://jolastic.id/index.php/jlsp/article/view/56
31. Political affiliation may help drive and shape a person’s morals | Penn State University, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/political-affiliation-may-help-drive-and-shape-persons-morals
32. Moral Polarization and Out-Party Hostility in the US Political Context, accessed May 8, 2025, https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/article/view/5135/5135.html
33. Why Moral Advocacy Leads to Polarization and Proselytization: The Role of Self-Persuasion – Journal of Social and Political Psychology, accessed May 8, 2025, https://jspp.psychopen.eu/index.php/jspp/article/download/5263/5263.pdf/
34. Study shows politics bend moral judgments, tolerance – | Nebraska Today, accessed May 8, 2025, https://news.unl.edu/article/study-shows-politics-bend-moral-judgments-tolerance
35. The Complex Relationship Between US Politics, Religion, and Morality – NEXUS-IBA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nexus.org/us-politics-religion-morality-trump-hush-money-trial/
36. Ethical Frameworks in Policy Making | Intro to Public Policy Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed May 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/introduction-to-public-policy/unit-11/ethical-frameworks-policy-making/study-guide/A1nii2uc4LH1Lhvm
37. Utilitarianism – Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics – Rebus Press, accessed May 8, 2025, https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-ethics/chapter/utilitarianism/
38. www.betterhelp.com, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.betterhelp.com/advice/happiness/what-is-the-greatest-happiness-principle/#:~:text=Used%20as%20the%20foundation%20for,defined%20as%20happiness%20without%20pain.
39. What Is The Greatest Happiness Principle? – BetterHelp, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.betterhelp.com/advice/happiness/what-is-the-greatest-happiness-principle/
40. Kantian Deontology – Introduction to Philosophy: Ethics – Rebus Press, accessed May 8, 2025, https://press.rebus.community/intro-to-phil-ethics/chapter/kantian-deontology/
41. Categorical Imperative – Queensborough Community College, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.qcc.cuny.edu/socialSciences/ppecorino/INTRO_TEXT/Chapter%208%20Ethics/Categorical_Imperative.htm
42. Categorical imperative – Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative
43. Origins and Core Principles of Virtue Ethics | Ethics Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed May 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/ethics/unit-4/origins-core-principles-virtue-ethics/study-guide/rLV5DFVTHgB4mSfG
44. Explain the approach taken to moral decision making by virtue ethics. Flashcards – Quizlet, accessed May 8, 2025, https://quizlet.com/gb/867525381/explain-the-approach-taken-to-moral-decision-making-by-virtue-ethics-flash-cards/
45. Five Ways to Think Ethically – Markkula Center for Applied Ethics – YouTube, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTpwUUNepZc
46. Norms and Values In Sociology: Definition & Examples – Simply Psychology, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.simplypsychology.org/norms-and-values.html
47. The Importance of Adhering to Personal Norms and Values – in a Natural & Artificial world, accessed May 8, 2025, https://renierbotha.com/2024/04/30/the-importance-of-adhering-to-personal-norms-and-values-natural-artificial/
48. Values And Morals Clarification – MentalHealth.com, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.mentalhealth.com/library/clarifying-values-and-morals
49. Ethical Relativism – Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/ethical-relativism/
50. The Influence of Culture on Morality and Ethical Decision-Making, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.horizonp.de/2023/11/03/the-influence-of-culture-on-morality-and-ethical-decision-making/
51. Ethical Explorations: Unraveling the Dimensions of Ethical Behavior – JWU Online, accessed May 8, 2025, https://online.jwu.edu/blog/ethical-explorations-unraveling-the-dimensions-of-ethical-behavior/
52. Selective morality: how social context affects moral values | Esade – Do Better, accessed May 8, 2025, https://dobetter.esade.edu/en/selective-moral-values
53. The Effects of Social Perception on Moral Judgment – Frontiers, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557216/full
54. Developing Your Personal Code of Ethics Examples – V-Comply, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.v-comply.com/blog/sample-personal-code-of-ethics-examples/
55. How to Write a Personal Ethics Statement—And Why Every Professional Should, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.wgu.edu/blog/how-write-personal-ethics-statement-why-every-professional-should2202.html
56. Personal Core Values – How to Use Them to Make Decisions – ArcStone, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.arcstone.com/core-values/
57. How can I construct my own personal moral system? : r/askphilosophy – Reddit, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/x3slr5/how_can_i_construct_my_own_personal_moral_system/
58. Practitioner’s Guide to Ethical Decision Making – American Counseling Association, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/ethics/practioner-39-s-guide-to-ethical-decision-making.pdf
59. Developing Personal Ethical Frameworks | Ethics Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed May 8, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/ethics/unit-15/developing-personal-ethical-frameworks/study-guide/JkA7oxI9fSftpQ9u
60. hub.edubirdie.com, accessed May 8, 2025, https://hub.edubirdie.com/examples/utilitarianism-examples-in-everyday-life/#:~:text=Healthcare%20provides%20one%20of%20the,the%20largest%20number%20of%20people.
61. Virtue ethics | Business Ethics in the Digital Age Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed May 8, 2025, https://fiveable.me/business-ethics-in-the-digital-age/unit-1/virtue-ethics/study-guide/EFDq4tQmudmtMKab
62. Deontology to Judge the Ethical Business Actions: The Case of Takata, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=91728
63. Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine – PMC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4778182/
64. Business Ethics Cases – Markkula Center for Applied Ethics – Santa Clara University, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/cases/
65. Strengthening Your Moral Compass to Overcome Ethical Roadblocks | icma.org, accessed May 8, 2025, https://icma.org/articles/pm-magazine/strengthening-your-moral-compass-overcome-ethical-roadblocks